Keratograph眼表综合分析仪与传统方法对泪膜功能评价的一致性分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

海南省卫生和计划生育委员会普通医学科研项目(No.琼卫2014-055)


Consistency analysis of Keratograph and traditional methods to evaluate tear film function
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Ordinary Medical Scientific Research Project of Health and Family Planning Commission of Hainan Province(No.2014-055)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨一种最新的眼表综合分析仪Keratograph对于泪膜稳定性评估的重复性和准确性,将其测量值与传统的检查方法进行比较。

    方法:采用Keratograph测量包括首次泪膜破裂时间(the first tear film break-up time, BUT-f)和平均泪膜破裂时间(the average tear film break-up time, BUT-ave)在内的非侵入式泪膜破裂时间(noninvasive tear film break-up time, NI_BUT)结果。测量结果的重复性使用变异系数(coefficient of variation,CV)和组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient,ICC)进行评价, NI-BUT与传统的荧光素泪膜破裂时间(fluorescein tear film break-up time, FBUT)的比较采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验,确定NI-BUT与FBUT,Schirmer Ⅰ试验结果的相关关系,采用Bland-Altman分析进行一致性评价。

    结果:本研究纳入了48个受检者(48眼),平均年龄38.7±15.2岁。BUT-f的CV和ICC分别为12.6%和0.95,BUT-ave的为9.8%和0.96。BUT-f值低于FBUT值,差异有统计学意义(6.16±2.46s vs 7.46±1.92s, P < 0.01)。NI-BUT与FBUT,Schirmer Ⅰ试验结果之间存在显著的正相关关系(P<0.01)。BUT-f与FBUT的95%一致性界限(limits of agreement, LoA)范围为4.46s,BUT-ave与FBUT的LoA范围为3.64s。

    结论:Keratograph能够提供具有较好重复性和可靠性的NI-BUT数据,在干眼诊治和角膜屈光性手术等领域有很好的应用前景。

    Abstract:

    AIM: To investigate repeatability and accuracy of a latest Keratograph for evaluating the tear film stability and to compare its measurements with that of traditional examination methods.

    METHODS: The results of noninvasive tear film break-up time(NI-BUT)including the first tear film break-up time(BUT-f)and the average tear film break-up time(BUT-ave)were measured by Keratograph. The repeatability of the measurements was evaluated by coefficient of variation(CV)and intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC). Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used to compare NI-BUT with fluorescein tear film break-up time(FBUT)to confirm the correlation between NI-BUT and FBUT, Schirmer I test values. Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate consistency.

    RESULTS: The study recruited 48 subjects(48 eyes)(mean age 38.7±15.2 years). The CV and ICC of BUT-f were respectively 12.6% and 0.95, those of BUT-ave were 9.8% and 0.96. The value of BUT-f was lower than that of FBUT. The difference had statistical significance(6.16±2.46s vs 7.46±1.92s, P<0.01). There was significant positive correlation between NI-BUT and FBUT, Schirmer I test values(P<0.01). The scope of 95% limits of agreement(LoA)was 4.46s in BUT-f and FBUT, while the scope of LoA was 3.64s in BUT-ave and FBUT.

    CONCLUSION: Keratograph can provide NI-BUT data that has a better repeatability and reliability, which has great application prospects in diagnosis and treatment of dry eye and refractive corneal surgery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

沈沛阳,陈海波,刘红山,等. Keratograph眼表综合分析仪与传统方法对泪膜功能评价的一致性分析.国际眼科杂志, 2015,15(5):846-849.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-22
  • 最后修改日期:2015-04-21
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-05-05
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码