0.05%环孢素A治疗干眼有效性和安全性Meta分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.81960181)


Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of 0.05% cyclosporine A in the treatment of dry eye
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81960181)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:对0.05%环孢素A(CsA)滴眼液治疗干眼的安全性和有效性进行系统评价。

    方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网数据库、维普中文科技期刊数据库、万方数据库。纳入各数据库2016-01-01/2022-03-28 0.05%CsA滴眼液治疗干眼的随机对照试验。CsA组采用0.05%CsA滴眼液治疗,对照组采用人工泪液、安慰剂等进行治疗。采用ReMan 5.3软件对治疗后泪液分泌试验(SⅠt)、泪膜破裂时间(BUT)、角膜荧光素染色(CFS)、眼表疾病指数(OSDI)、不良反应进行Meta分析。

    结果:共纳入13篇文献,共1 164例2 057眼。与对照组相比,CsA组SⅠt延长(MD=2.04,95%CI:1.75~2.33,P<0.00001),BUT更久(MD=1.32,95%CI:0.87~1.76,P<0.00001),CFS降低(MD=-0.79,95%CI:-1.20~-0.39,P=0.0001),OSDI降低(MD=-5.52,95%CI:-9.14~-1.91,P=0.003)。但CsA组出现不良反应更多(OR=1.69,95%CI:1.06~2.72,P=0.03)。

    结论:0.05%CsA可改善干眼患者的主观症状及各项客观指标。但与人工泪液等药物相比,0.05%CsA治疗后出现的眼部烧灼感等不良反应更多。

    Abstract:

    AIM: To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of 0.05% cyclosporine A(CsA)in the treatment of dry eye.

    METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Bio-Medical Literature Database, CNKI, VIP, and Wan Fang Database were retrieved. Randomized controlled trials related to the treatment of dry eye with 0.05%CsA from January 1, 2016 to March 28, 2022 in each database were included. The CsA group was treated with 0.05% CsA eye drops, and the control group was treated with artificial tears and placebo. ReMan 5.3 was used for Meta-analysis of post-treatment Schirmer Ⅰ test(SⅠt), break up time(BUT), corneal fluorescein staining(CFS), ocular surface disease index(OSDI)and adverse effects.

    RESULTS: A total of 13 literatures were included, which included 1 164 cases(2 057 eyes). Compared with the control group, the SIt in the CsA group was prolonged(MD=2.04, 95%CI: 1.75~2.33, P<0.00001), BUT was longer(MD=1.32, 95%CI: 0.87~1.76, P<0.00001), CFS decreased(MD=-0.79, 95%CI: -1.20~-0.39, P=0.0001)and OSDI decreased(MD=-5.52, 95%CI: -9.14~-1.91, P=0.003). However, the CsA group had more adverse reactions(OR=1.69, 95%CI: 1.06~2.72, P=0.03).

    CONCLUSION: 0.05% CsA can improve the subjective symptoms and various objective indicators of dry eye patients. However, 0.05% CsA seems to produce more adverse effects, like ocular burning sensation when compared to drugs such as artificial tears.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

田小辉,胡鹿梅,易湘龙,等.0.05%环孢素A治疗干眼有效性和安全性Meta分析.国际眼科杂志, 2023,23(2):248-255.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-03
  • 最后修改日期:2023-01-18
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码