景深延长型人工晶状体植入后患者屈光状态准确性评估
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

上海市眼病防治中心院内临床研究培育课题(No.21LC01003,21LC01007)


Accuracy assessment of refractive status in patients implanted with extended depth of focus intraocular lens
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Clinical Research and Cultivation Project of Shanghai Eye Diseases Prevention & Treatment Center(No.21LC01003, 21LC01007)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:使用电脑验光和OPD-Scan Ⅲ自动验光检查白内障患者植入景深延长型人工晶状体术后屈光状态。

    方法:回顾性病例观察研究。收集2022-05/2023-05于上海市眼病防治中心行白内障超声乳化吸除术并植入TECNIS®; Symfony ZXR00人工晶状体( IOL)患者61例76眼。所有患者术后同一天行电脑验光、OPD-Scan Ⅲ自动验光和综合验光仪主觉验光检查。

    结果:电脑验光球镜、等效球镜与综合验光仪主觉验光球镜、等效球镜比较均有差异(均P<0.01),球镜、等效球镜差异值分别为-0.67±0.37 D和-0.75±0.35 D,与综合验光仪主觉验光相比,电脑验光球镜、等效球镜均偏近视; 电脑验光柱镜与综合验光仪主觉验光柱镜有差异(P<0.01),二者差异绝对值较小(0.21±0.24 D)。电脑验光球镜、柱镜、等效球镜与综合验光仪主觉验光球镜、柱镜、等效球镜均正相关(r=0.7994、0.7929、0.8118,均P<0.01)。OPD-Scan Ⅲ自动验光球镜、柱镜、等效球镜与综合验光仪主觉验光比较均有差异(P<0.01),球镜、柱镜、等效球镜差异绝对值(0.63±0.36、0.35±0.26和0.53±0.36 D)较小。OPD-Scan Ⅲ自动验光球镜、柱镜、等效球镜与主觉验光球镜、柱镜、等效球镜均正相关(r=0.4410、0.4982、0.5224,均P<0.01)。

    结论:景深延长型IOL植入术后电脑验光、OPD-Scan Ⅲ自动验光与综合验光仪主觉验光一致性较好,电脑验光球镜和等效球镜平均差异较大,但均呈现近视偏差,柱镜差异小; OPD-Scan Ⅲ自动验光与主觉验光平均差异较小,但差异方向不稳定,有时为近视偏差,有时为远视偏差。

    Abstract:

    AIM: To evaluate the refractive status through computer refractometer and OPD-Scan III auto refractometer in cataract patients after extended depth of focus(EDOF)intraocular lens implantation.

    METHODS: Retrospective observational study. A total of 61 cases(76 eyes)that received phacomulsification and implanted with TECNIS® Symfony ZXR00 intraocular lens in Shanghai Eye Diseases Prevention & Treatment Center from May 2022 to May 2023 were collected. Measurements from the computer refractometer, OPD-Scan III auto refractometer, and subjective refraction, were taken from all patients on the same day postoperatively.

    RESULTS: There were statistical significant difference in sphere(S)and spherical equivalent(SE)readings from the computer refractometer and subjective refraction(all P<0.01), with mean differences of -0.67±0.37 D and -0.75±0.35 D, respectively, and the S and SE obtained from computer refractometer more incline to myopia than those from subjective refraction; there were statistical significant difference in computer refractometer and subjective refraction(P<0.01), with a relative small absolute difference(0.21±0.24 D). The S, cylinder(C)and SE of computer refractometer(S, C, SE)were positively correlated with subjective refraction(r=0.7994, 0.7929, and 0.8118, respectively, all P<0.01). Additionally, there were statistical significant differences in S, C and SE of OPD-Scan Ⅲ and subjective refraction(P<0.01), and the absolute differences of S(0.63±0.36 D), C(0.35±0.26 D)and SE(0.53±0.36 D)were small. Furthermore, the S, C and SE of OPD-Scan Ⅲ were positively correlated with subjective refraction(r=0.4410, 0.4982, 0.5224, all P<0.01).

    CONCLUSION: In patients who received implantation of EDOF lenses, the consistency of computer refractometer, OPD-Scan III auto refractometer and subjective refraction was good. The average difference of the S and SE obtained via computer refractometer was large, but both exhibited a myopic shift relative to those derived from subjective refraction, and the C values demonstrated minimal discrepancy. Furthermore, the differences between OPD-Scan III auto refractometer and subjective refraction were small, but the direction of the difference is unstable, sometimes it is myopic deviation, while sometimes it is hyperopic deviation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

于春霞,方晓玲,薛文文,等.景深延长型人工晶状体植入后患者屈光状态准确性评估.国际眼科杂志, 2024,24(11):1821-1825.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-22
  • 最后修改日期:2024-09-27
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-10-18
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码