Discuss on bone hole size of nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy
Author:
Corresponding Author:

Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM:To discuss the effect of bone hole size in nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy on the operation results to find the most appropriate size of the bone hole. METHODS:A randomized, single-blind, parallel study. 200 cases of 200 eyes of chronic dacryocystitis for nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy treatment in Zhuzhou 331 Aier Eye Hospital from 2010-01 to 2010-10 were randomly divided into two groups: A group of 100 eyes: bone hole size was 6mm×6mm (±2mm), B group of 100 eyes: bone hole size was10mm×10mm(±2mm) or more. Surgery was done with corresponding size of the bone hole by grouping, various adverse effects and results of operations were observed postoperatively. RESULTS:In A group, 9 cases of bone thick-walled and 3 cases of bad bone hole location needed to expand the bone hole, 4 cases were lost, 84 cases finally entered the observed cases, including 2 ineffective cases and 82 effective cases. In B group, three cases were lost, and 97 cases finally entered the observed cases, including 3 ineffective cases and 94 effective cases.The two groups had no statistically significant difference in success rate, patients of A group had less postoperative reaction and responded better. CONCLUSION:The bone hole size of 6mm×6mm (±2mm) is appropriate for nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy to treat chronic dacryocystitis, featured by minimally invasive, less bleeding, less postoperative adverse reactions and no affecting results of operations.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Li-Ping Shi, Hong-Zhuan Ouyang, Min Dai, et al. Discuss on bone hole size of nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2012;12(2):367-368

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:October 24,2011
  • Revised:December 19,2011
  • Adopted:
  • Online:
  • Published: