Investigation on the variation in macular retinal thickness of high myopia
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [11]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To investigate the variation in macular retinal thickness of healthy Chinese myopic subjects by using optical coherence tomography(OCT).

    METHODS: A total of 20 cases 20 eyes of normal subjects and 48 cases 48 eyes of high myopia(spherical equivalent\〖SE\〗 <-6.0D)were underwent examination of optical coherence tomography(Zeiss - Humphrey OCT3000). Fast macular thickness map OCT scans of 6 mm were done well on each eye. The minimum foveal and average foveal(1mm ring on the OCT retinal thickness map)thicknesses, the inner ring(1-3mm)macular thickness and the outer ring macular(3-6mm)thicknesses of superior, nasal, temporal and inferior parafovea retinal thickness were recorded.

    RESULTS: The retina thickness at the superior was significantly thicker, and the inferior and nasal sides ofparafovea was thicker than the temporal one at the inner ring(1-3mm)macular. The retina thickness at the nasal sides was significantly thicker, and the inferior and superior of parafovea was thicker than the temporal one at the inner ring(3-6mm)macular. 2)The minimum foveal and average foveal(1mm ring on the OCT retinal thickness map)thicknesses were significantly greater than in the normal group. The inner ring(1-3mm)and all(except the superior)of the outer ring macular(3-6mm)thicknesses were significantly lower in the high myopic eyes than in the normal group. No significant difference was found in the superior of the outer ring macular(3-6mm)thicknesses between the high myopic group and the normal group(P<0.05).

    CONCLUSION: Retinal thickness is related with regional variations in correlation within the 6-mm macular region. The attenuation was really existed in high myopia. It was inparafovea area but not fovea.

    Reference
    1 McCarty CA,Tailor HR. Editorial: Myopia and vision 2020. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129(4):525-527
    2 Yanoff M, Fine B. Ocular Pathology: A Text and Atlas. Third Edition. Philadelphia:J. B. Lippincott 1989:408
    3 Montero JA,Ruiz-Moreno JM.Macular thickness in patients with choroidal neovascularization determined by RTA and OCT3:comparative results. Eye 2005; 19(1):72-76
    4 Koozekanani D, Roberts C, Katz SE, et al. Intersession repeatability of macular thickness measurements with the Humphrey 2000 OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41:1486-1491
    5李凤鸣.眼科全书(上册).北京:人民卫生出版社 1996:336
    6 Hee MR, Puliafito CA, Wong C, et al. Quantitative assessment of macular edema with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113:1019
    7 Gobel W, Hartmann F, Haigis W. Determination of retinal thickness in relation to the age and axial length using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmologe 2001; 98:157-162
    8 Kanai K, Abe T, Murayama K, et al. Retinal thickness and changes with age. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2002; 106:162-165
    9 Rada JA, Achen VR, Penugonda S, et al. Proteoglycan composition in the human sclera during growth and aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41(7):1639-1648
    10 Koozekanani D, Roberts C, Katz SE,et al. Intersession repeatability of macular thickness measurements with the Humphrey 2000 OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41:1486-1491
    11 Robin R, Sandda SS, Glenn JJ. Evaluation of image artifact produced by optical coherence tomography of retinal pathology. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139:18-29
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Yan-Ming Zhang, Wei-Hong Zhang. ,/et al.Investigation on the variation in macular retinal thickness of high myopia. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2013;13(5):950-952

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1944
  • PDF: 1552
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:February 23,2013
  • Revised:April 22,2013
  • Online: May 06,2013