Refractive errors progression among pupils in Hetian Road primary school of Shanghai: 1-year followed-up
Author:
Fund Project:

Medical Guide Project of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission in 2010(No.10411964900); Outstanding Young Talent Training Projects of Shanghai Health System in 2011(No.XYQ2011067)

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [15]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM:To investigate the progression of refractive errors of pupils in Hetian Road primary school of Shanghai Zhabei community and analyze the relationship between refractive errors progression and relative factors.

    METHODS:All the 6-12 years old in-school pupils in Hetian Road primary school of Shanghai Zhabei community were invited in the study. The participates were examined first-visit in May 2011 and second-visit in May 2012. All the 303 pupils(606 eyes)were investigated the age, height(H), weight(W), uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), diopter of spherical(DS), diopter of cylinder(DC), spherical equivalent(SE), axial length(AL), and corneal curvature(K). The progression of refractive condition was described and the relevant factors were analyzed.

    RESULTS:Among 606 eyes, the progression of average SE was -0.45±0.60D and the progression of average AL was 0.32±0.25mm. The progression of SE diopter was positively correlated with the progression of AL(r=0.409, P<0.01). Among all eyes, 473 eyes of them developed to myopia(the progression of SE was negative)with the prevalence of 78.1%. To analyze the relationship between the progression of AL and W, when the pupils with the weight increased among 4-6kg/a, their progression of AL was the slowest(0.28±0.20mm, P=0.004). The youngest pupils with 6-8 years old, had the fastest progression of AL(0.39±0.24mm, P<0.01). There was no significantly different between H growth and DS, DC or SE(P>0.05). The incidence of poor sight(UCVA<1.0)in 2012(47.0%)was higher than that in 2011(31.5%), while it was also higher in 10-year older group(52%)than that in 10-year younger group(10%).

    CONCLUSION:Myopia is the main progression of refractive error in the pupils of Hetian Road primary school in Shanghai Zhabei community. AL and growth development is closely related to the progression of refractive errors.

    Reference
    1 Gilmartin B. Myopia: precedents for research in the twenty-first century. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2004; 32(3):305-324
    2 Hsu SL, Chang CH, Lai YH, et al. Refractive status of mountain aborigine schoolchildren in southern Taiwan. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008; 24(3): 120-125
    3 Ganekal S, Jhanji V, Liang Y, et al. Prevalence and Etiology of Amblyopia in Southern India: Results from Screening of School Children Aged 5-15 years. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2013; 20(4):228-231
    4 Morgan A, Young R, Narankhand B, et al. Prevalence rate of myopia in schoolchildren in rural Mongolia. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83(1):53-56
    5 Lopes MC, Andrew T, Carbonaro F, et al. Estimating heritability and shared environmental effects for refractive error in twin and family studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50(1):126-131
    6 Zhang M, Li L, Chen L, et al. Population density and refractive error among Chinese Children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51(10):4969-4976
    7 Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Moeschberger ML, et al. Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43(12):3633-3640
    8 Ip JM, Saw SM, Rose KA,et al. Role of near work in myopia: findings in a sample of Australian school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49(7):2903-2910
    9 Zhao J, Mao J, Luo R,et al. The progression of refractive error in school-age children: Shunyi District, China. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134(5):735-743
    10 Lin LL, Shih YF, Lee YC,et al. Changes in ocular refraction and its components among medical students: a 5-year longitudinal study. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73(7):495-498
    11 Fan DS, Lam DS, Lam RF, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and progression of myopia of school children in Hong Kong. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45(4):1071-1075
    12 Hyman L, Gwiazda J, Hussein M, et al. Relationship of age, sex, and ethnicity with myopia progression and axial elongation in the correction of myopia evaluation trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123(7):977-987
    13 Zhang J, Hur YM, Huang W, et al. Shared genetic determinants of axial length and height in children: the Guangzhou twin eye study. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129(1):63-68
    14 Yip VC, Pan CW, Lin XY, et al. The relationship between growth spurts and myopia in Singapore children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53(13):7961-7966
    15 Selovic A, Juresa V, Ivankovic D, et al. Relationship between axial length of the emmetropic eye and the age, body height, and body weight of schoolchildren. Am J Hum Biol 2005; 17(2):173-177
    Cited by
Get Citation

Hui Shi, Yan-Hong Li, Li Li,/et al.Refractive errors progression among pupils in Hetian Road primary school of Shanghai: 1-year followed-up. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2013;13(12):2491-2494

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:September 02,2013
  • Revised:November 13,2013
  • Online: November 25,2013