Influence of overnight orthokeratology on contrast sensitivity of adolescent myopia
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [13]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM:To observe the changes of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function in teenagers with different diopters after wearing overnight orthokeratology in order to understand the effects on visual quality.

    METHODS:A self-controlled study was used. Eighty four young myopic subjects(156 eyes)aged 12.60±2.03 years in which there were forty males and forty-four females with spherical equivalent(SE)-3.65±0.79D were recruited in the study from March 1st 2013 to May 30th 2015. Based on diopters, the subjects were divided into group A(-0.75~-2.00D), group B(-2.25~-4.00D)and group C(-4.25~-6.00D). All the lenses were worn every night over 8 hours. Uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA),subjective refraction,best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), contrast sensitivity function were examined before,1,6,12mo after the initiation of orthokeratology. The database was analyzed by SPSS17.0 using one-way ANOVA.

    RESULT:1)Comparison between risual acuity and SE: The UCVA improved significantly and SE decreased after wearing orthokeratology lens 1,6,12mo in 3 groups, showing significant decline in comparison with that before orthokeratology(P<0.05). There was no significant change among 1,6,12mo after wearing orthokeratology(P>0.05). There was no significant change in BCVA(P>0.05). 2)Comparison on contrast sensitivity function: Contrast sensitivity function at all spatial frequencies in 3 groups 1,6,12mo after wearing lenses compared with those before wearing: There was no change before and after wearing at the low spatial frequency(3c/d)and the high spatial frequency(18c/d), but slight increases in group A and group B in the spatial frequency(6c/d, 12c/d)after wearing lenses. There were slight decreases in group C at all spatial frequencies after wearing.But there was no statistical significance between before and after wearing in all three groups(P>0.05).

    CONCLUSION:Overnight orthokeratology can improve UCVA and has no obvious effect on the overall visual quality. It deserves to be applied and spreaded in clinical practice.

    Reference
    1何其琼,罗建平,谢钊,等.角膜塑形镜控制青少年近视发展的疗效观察.医学信息 2011; 24(7):154
    2谢培英,王志昕,迟惠,等. 少年儿童近视的长期角膜塑形疗效和安全性观察.中国斜视与小儿眼科杂志 2008; 16(4):145-152
    3陈云云,陈世豪,王勤关,等. 近视眼不同视觉质量与成像质量评估指标间的关系.中国实用眼科杂志 2012; 30(1): 61-64
    4赵堪兴.眼科学.北京:人民卫生出版社 2013:101-102
    5朱超.视觉对比敏感度的临床应用. 眼科新进展 2006; 26(6):466-469
    6牛燕,李斌,姬娜,等.角膜塑形镜治疗青少年中度近视的临床观察.中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 2014; 16(2):92-94
    7陈建卓,陈露,李媛媛,等.角膜塑形镜423例临床应用报告.国际眼科杂志 2012; 12(1):130-132
    8王志斌,冯敏,涂萍萍,等.现代角膜塑形镜控制小学生近视发展的临床研究.中华临床医师杂志 2011; 5(21):6476-6479
    9杨丽萍,吴艳,曹茜,等.青少年配戴角膜塑形镜后的对比敏感度研究. 医学研究所学报2012; 25(3):252-254
    10马薇,廖孟,金宏智,等.青少年近视患者夜戴角膜塑形镜后视觉质量的评估.中华实验眼科杂志 2012; 30(12):1104-1108
    11雷蕾,郑磊,王倩,等.正视及低中度、高度近视人群明暗环境对比敏感度分析.眼科新进展 2008; 28(8):604-609
    12张婷,保金华,郑志利,等.夜戴型角膜塑形镜对角膜形态及视觉质量影响的研究.中国实用眼科杂志 2013; 31(3):293-298
    13杨丽娜,周建兰,谢培英,等.Toric设计角膜塑形镜与视觉质量.中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 2013; 15(2):79-83
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Yang-Li Huang, Li Chen, Hong-Yan Jin,/et al.Influence of overnight orthokeratology on contrast sensitivity of adolescent myopia. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2015;15(11):1967-1969

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1917
  • PDF: 1375
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:July 20,2015
  • Revised:October 20,2015
  • Online: October 30,2015