Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using the Lenstar, Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry methods in cataract patients
Author:
Corresponding Author:

Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To compare the central corneal thickness(CCT), keratometry(K)reading, anterior chamber depth(ACD), and axial length(AL)measured with Lenstar and Pentacam with those obtained with the ultrasound(US)pachymetry in the cataract patients.

    METHODS: A total of 158 eyes of 158 patients were examined in this study. The CCT, average K, ACD and AL obtained by Lenstar and/or Pentacam were compared with those obtained from US pachymetry using repeated-measures analysis of variance, Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses.

    RESULTS: The mean CCT obtained using Lenstar and Pentacam were 536.54±27.90μm and 541.46±29.85μm(t=-5.439; P<0.001). The mean Km obtained using Lenstar and Pentacam methods were 43.87±1.45D and 43.86±1.44 D(t=-0.348, P>0.05). The mean ACD measured using the Pentacam, Lenstar, and US pachymetry were 2.73±0.38mm, 2.71±0.38mm, and 2.85±0.40 mm, respectively(F=309.94, P<0.001), and they were positively correlated(r=0.989, 0.978, and 0.977; P<0.001)and the coefficient of variation was small(3.12%). The mean AL obtained by US pachymetry and Lenstar were 24.28±1.70mm and 24.52±1.73 mm, respectively(t=-19.482, P<0.001, r=0.996; P<0.001). The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the three methods were comparable for CCT, Km, ACD and AL.

    CONCLUSION: Although there were statistically significant differences, the measurements obtained by the Lenstar and the Pentacam were highly repeatable and the instruments easy to use.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Jing Zhang, Jing-Cai Lian, Shi-Sheng Zhang, et al. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using the Lenstar, Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry methods in cataract patients. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2016;16(4):594-599

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:May 17,2015
  • Revised:November 30,2015
  • Adopted:
  • Online: March 28,2016
  • Published: