Effect of pterygium transplantation combined with amniotic membrane transplantation plus bandage contact lenses for pterygium
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [13]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To investigate the effect of pterygium transplantation combined with amniotic membrane transplantation plus bandage type contact lenses.

    METHODS: Totally 72 patients(80 eyes)with pterygium treated in our hospital from December 2014 to December 2016 were enrolled and divided into observation group and control group according to the randomized method, with 37 cases(41 eyes), 35 cases(39 eyes)respectively. The control group was treated with pterygium transplantation combined with amniotic membrane transplantation. On the basis of this, the observation group received bandage contact lens. The postoperative visual acuity, curative effect, recurrence rate, and corneal healing time were recorded during the postoperative 1-year follow-up. Non contact tonometer was used to detect intraocular pressure(IOP)before operation and after operation 1d, 1, 3, 6, and 12mo. Then the incidence of postoperative complications was recorded.

    RESULTS: In order to determine the curative effect, a 4-grade standard was devised, from Ⅰ to Ⅳ. The postoperative efficacy of observation group consisted of 19 eyes in grade Ⅰ, 11 eyes in grade Ⅱ, 8 eyes in grade Ⅲ, 3 eyes in grade Ⅳ, while the control group had 16 eyes in grade Ⅰ, 12 eyes in grade Ⅱ, 8 eyes in grade Ⅲ, 3 eyes in grade Ⅳ, with no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05). Visual acuity in the observation group increased in 20 eyes, remained in 17 eyes, and decreased in 4 eyes. In control group, visual acuity increased in 16 eyes, remained in 17 eyes, and decreased in 6 eyes, with no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05). The corneal healing time was 3.43 ±1.03d in the observation group and 5.13±1.16d in the control group, which was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05). The IOP of the two groups before operation and after operation 1d, 1, 3, 6, and 12mo showed no significant difference(P>0.05). After the operation, only 1 eyes of corneal scar were found in the control group, and no other complications were found in the two groups such as intraocular pressure and corneal astigmatism.

    CONCLUSION: Compared with pterygium transposition alone, combined amniotic membrane transplantation plus bandage contact lens is an effective and safe way to improve corneal healing time for patients with pterygium.

    Reference
    1李游, 刘丹, 庞东渤. 玻璃酸钠滴眼液对翼状胬肉转位术后泪膜恢复的作用. 国际眼科杂志 2013; 13(6):1272-1274
    2李翔, 毛肖丽. 锁边缝合结合连续缝合在翼状胬肉切除联合结膜转位术中的应用. 国际眼科杂志 2015; 15(8):1469-1471
    3 Li X, Mao XL. Application of interlocking suture combined with simple continuous suture in pterygium excision with conjunctival translocation. Int Eye Sci 2015; 15(8):1469-1471
    4蒋冬红, 鞠丽燕, 叶国圣,等. 两种翼状胬肉切除联合结膜移植术式的临床对照研究. 中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志 2017; 17(1):40-42
    5何亚妮, 李桂香, 段直光. 翼状胬肉切除术后巩膜融解并发症原因分析. 中国实用眼科杂志 2014; 32(9):1110-1112
    6郭春艳, 张文芳, 吴鹏程. 翼状胬肉切除结合不同方法治疗翼状胬肉的疗效分析. 中国临床研究 2016; 9:1252-1253
    7 Luna G, Janardhana P, Munir W, et al. Risk of recurrence and surgical complications of pterygium surgery performed by ophthalmologists-in-training. Russian J Genetics 2015; 50(7):728-735
    8李友谊. 原发性翼状胬肉联合治疗效果观察. 临床和实验医学杂志 2015; 23(17):1464-1466
    9刘辉, 覃冬菊, 徐建江,等. 两种自体结膜移植治疗翼状胬肉的疗效分析. 海南医学 2014; 24:3712-3714
    10颜巧灵, 许长生, 徐茂晖. 三种手术方式治疗翼状胬肉的疗效比较. 实用医院临床杂志 2014; 11(4):201-203
    11刘占江. 显微镜下行翼状胬肉切除联合带蒂结膜瓣覆盖术83例分析. 江苏医药2014; 40(3):329-330
    12张淑锟, 陈明新. 翼状胬肉手术方式的探讨. 江苏医药 2015; 41(24):3062-3063
    13包永琴, 郭从容, 董白霞,等. 翼状胬肉手术疗效的前瞻性研究. 河北医科大学学报2013; 34(11):1403-1404
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Xia Zhang, Qiang Tang, Qian Xu. ,/et al.Effect of pterygium transplantation combined with amniotic membrane transplantation plus bandage contact lenses for pterygium. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2018;18(6):1146-1148

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1079
  • PDF: 1051
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:February 22,2018
  • Revised:May 11,2018
  • Online: May 25,2018