Comparison of visual quality between bifocal and trifocal intraocular lens implantation
Author:
Fund Project:

Shenzhen Sanming Project(No.SZSM201812091)

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [13]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To compare the visual quality of bifocal(AT LISA 809MP)and trifocal(AT LISA tri 839MP)IOLs after implantation.

    METHODS: Retrospective study. A total of 49 eyes of 28 patients with cataract who underwent phacoemulsification combined with multifocal IOL implantation from March 2018 to February 2019 were collected. There were 30 eyes of 18 patients in the bifocal group, aged 40-85(mean 67.08±10.80)years. The trifocal group consisted of 19 eyes of 10 patients, aged 38-79(mean 62.21±14.50)years. All patients underwent visual quality analysis system(OQAS), defocus curve and other examinations.

    RESULTS: The near BCVA of the two focus groups was better than that of the three focus groups, and the medium UCVA and far BCVA of the three focus groups were better than those of the two focus groups(all P<0.05). The trifocal group had better visual acuity at +1.5, -1.0, -1.5, -2, -2.5D and -3.0D defocus than the bifocal group. OQAS visual quality parameters were better in the two-focus group than in the three-focus group in OV 20%, OV 9%, and SR(all P<0.05).

    CONCLUSION: Both bifocal and trifocal IOL implantation can achieve good uncorrected and near visual acuity and high visual quality, while trifocal IOL can achieve better intermediate visual acuity.

    Reference
    1魏超,张晗. 多焦点人工晶状体的临床应用进展.山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 2017; 31(4):29-35
    2李朝辉,叶子,黄扬. 多焦点人工晶状体存在“多焦点”问题. 中华眼科杂志 2017; 53(4):244-248
    3肖雪冰,乌兰,栾多,等. 三焦点人工晶状体植入术后的早期临床效果.中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 2017; 19(5):311-314
    4周星延,王静,赵江月,等. 三焦点人工晶状体术后早期临床观察. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 2018; 20(6):360-364
    5谢瞻,丁宇华,陈雪,等.高度近视白内障患者植入三焦点人工晶体的临床效果及生存质量观察.南京医科大学学报 2019; 39(3):365-369
    6 Liu X, Xie L, Huang Y. Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of Bifocal and Trifocal Intraocular Lenses Having an Identical Platform. J Refract Surg 2018; 34(4):273-280
    7 Jin S, Friedman DS, Cao K, et al. Comparison of postoperative visual performance between bifocal and trifocal intraocular Lens based on randomized controlled trails: a meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 2019; 19(1):78
    8 Yoon CH, Shin IS, Kim MK. Trifocal versus Bifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation after Cataract Surgery or Refractive Lens Exchange: a Meta-analysis. J Korean Med Sci 2018; 33(44):e275
    9 Yang Y, Lv H, Wang Y, et al. Clinical outcomes following trifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation for age-related cataract in China. Clin Ophthalmol 2018; 12:1317-1324
    10 Kretz FT, Choi CY, Müller M, et al. Visual Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction and Spectacle Independence with a Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens. Korean J Ophthalmol 2016; 30(3):180-191
    11高蓉蓉,郭燕,陈海丝,等.中国版视功能指数量表的修订及其在白内障患者生活质量评估中的应用.中华实验眼科杂志 2016; 34(9):823-828
    12 Akman A, Asena L, Ozturk C, et al. Evaluation of quality of life after implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019; 45(2):130-134
    13 Carson D, Hill WE, Hong X, et al. Optical bench performance of AcrySof(©)IQ ReSTOR(©), AT LISA(©)tri, and FineVision(©)intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 2014; 8:2105-2113
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Wei-Liang Lyu, Xin-Hua Liu, Jing Zhang. ,/et al.Comparison of visual quality between bifocal and trifocal intraocular lens implantation. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2020;20(1):41-44

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1054
  • PDF: 2038
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:August 06,2019
  • Revised:December 03,2019
  • Online: December 20,2019