Analysis on the reasons of postoperative refractive error after combined anterior and posterior segment surgery
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [28]
  • |
  • Related
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM:To analyze the postoperative refractive error(RE)and its related factors of patients with age-related cataract(ARC)and idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane(IMEM)after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens(IOL)implantation combined with 23G vitrectomy(PPV).

    METHODS: From February 2017 to September 2019,25 cases(25 eyes)of arc patients with IMEM who underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation combined with vitrectomy were selected as the observation group, and 25 cases(25 eyes)of simple arc patients treated with cataract phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were selected as the control group. The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA ), spherical equivalent(SEQ), corneal refractive power(CRP), anterior chamber depth(ACD), axial length(AL)and macular central foveal thickness(CFT)of the two groups before and after the operation were compared.

    RESULTS:At 3mo after operation, BCVA(0.284±0.177, 0.016±0.085)in observation group and control group were significantly improved compared with those before operation(0.572±0.199, 0.568±0.191), ACD was significantly increased(all P<0.001), but CRP and AL had no significant changes in both groups(P>0.05), and there was no difference in ACD, CRP and AL between the two groups(P>0.05). At 3mo after operation, the actual SEQ value in the observation group(-0.426±0.146D)was significantly higher than that before operation(-0.122±0.037D)and that of the control group(-0.127±0.050D)(all P<0.001). The refractive error of the observation group was -0.304±0.142D; the CFT value of the observation group(331.1±67.2μm)was significantly lower than that before operation(444.8±72.1μm), but higher than that of the control group(224.7±16.6μm)The change of CFT in observation group was 113.7±32.2μm. Correlation analysis showed that the refractive error was positively correlated with the change of CFT at 3mo after operation in the observation group(r=0.447, P=0.025).

    CONCLUSION: There was a positive correlation between myopic RE and CFT after Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens(IOL)implantation combined with 23G vitrectomy(PPV).

    Reference
    1 Falkner-Radler CI, Benesch T, Binder S. Accuracy of preoperative biometry in vitrectomy combined with cataract surgery for patients with epiretinal and macular holes: results of prospective controlled clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34(10): 1754-1760
    2 Tayyab H, Khan AA, Javaid RMM. Clinical outcome of 23g trans-conjunctival pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective comparison of phaco-vitrectomy with only vitrectomy in phakic eyes. Pak J Med Sci 2017; 33(5):1123-1127
    3 Pournaras CJ, Emarah A, Petropoulos IK. Idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane surgery and ILM peeling: anatomical and functional out comes. Semin Ophthalmol 2010; 26(2):42-46
    4 Okamoto F, Okamoto Y, Hiraoka T, et al. Effect of vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane on visual function and vision-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147(5):869-874
    5王睿, 惠娜, 雷春灵, 等. 23G和20G在玻璃体切除联合超乳术治疗特发性黄斑前膜合并白内障的疗效比较. 国际眼科杂志2017; 17(10):1886-1890
    6林丽, 陈亦棋, 沈丽君. 不同IOL计算公式对超声乳化人工晶状体植入联合玻璃体切割术治疗特发性黄斑前膜合并白内障患者术后屈光度预测准确性的研究. 中华实验眼科杂志2018; 36(3):204-208
    7 Hamoudi H, Kofod M, La Cour M. Refractive change after vitrectomy for epiretinalmembrane in pseudophakic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 2013; 91(5):434-436
    8 Sood V, Rahman R, Denniston AK. Phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens implantation combined with 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35(8): 1380-1384
    9刘佳, 王凯. 影响年龄相关性白内障术后屈光误差的术前眼球生物学参数特征分析. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志2015; 17(8):480-483
    10 Hamoudi H, Cour ML. Refractive changes after vitrectomy and phacovitrectomy for macular hole and epiretinal membrane. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39(6):942-947
    11董茜, 严宏, 苏丽萍, 等. 影响前后节联合手术屈光误差的相关因素分析. 国际眼科杂志2019; 19(6):956-959
    12 Kim M, Kim HE, Lee DH, et al. Intraocular lens power estimation in combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy in eyes with epiretinal membranes: a case-control study. Yonsei Med J 2015; 56(3):805-811
    13 Czajka MP, Frajdenberg A, Johansson B. Comparison of 1. 8-mm incision versus 2.75-mm incision cataract surgery in combined phacoemulsification and 23-gauge vitrectomy. Acta Ophthalmol 2016; 94(5):507-513
    14 Patel SB, Snyder ME, Riemann CD, et al. Short-term outcomes of combined pars plana vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane and phacoemulsification surgery with multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Clin Ophthalmol 2019; 13: 723-730
    15 Kim YK, Kim YW, Woo SJ, et al. Comparison of surgically-induced astigmatism after combined phacoemulsification and 23-gauge vitrectomy: 2.2-mm vs. 2.75-mm cataract surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol 2014; 28(2):130-137
    16 Sayed KM, Farouk MM, Katome T, et al. Corneal topographic changes and surgically induced astigmatism following combined phacoemulsification and 25-gauge vitrectomy. Int J Ophthalmol 2017; 10(1):72-76
    17 Watanabe T, Gekka T, Watanabe A, et al. Analysis of Changes in Corneal Topography after 27-Gauge Transconjunctival Microincision Vitrectomy Combined with Cataract Surgery. J Ophthalmol 2019; 2019:9658204
    18 Hötte GJ, de Bruyn DP, de Hoog J. Post-operative Refractive Prediction Error After Phacovitrectomy: A Retrospective Study. Ophthalmol Ther 2018; 7(1):83-94
    19 Shi L, Chang JS, Suh LH, et al. Differences in refractive outcomes between phacoemulsification for cataract alone and combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy for eriretinal membrane. Retina 2019; 39(7):1410-1415
    20 Patel D, Rahman R, Kumarasamy M. Accuracy of intraocular lens power estimation in eyes having phacovitrectomy for macular holes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33(10):1760-1762
    21 Wagenfeld L, Hermsdorf K, Stemplewitz B, et al. Refractive predictability in eyes with intraocular gas tamponade-results of a prospective controlled clinical trial. Clin Ophthalmol 2017; 11:993-998
    22王晓霞, 钱苗苗, 王丽, 等. 玻璃体切除术对晶状体悬韧带及前房深度的影响. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志2019; 41(3):194-197
    23 Frings A, Dulz S, Skevas C, et al. Postoperative refractive error after phacovitrectomy for epiretinal membrane with and without macular oedema. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253(7):1097-1104
    24 Shiraki N, Wakabayashi T, Sakaguchi H, et al. Optical biometry-based intraocular lens calculation and refractive outcomes after phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and epiretinal membrane. Sci Rep 2018; 8(1):11319
    25 Moon SW, Lim SH, Lee HY. Accuracy of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the new partial coherence interferometer, AL-scan. Korean J Ophthalmol 2014; 28(6):444-450
    26 Jee D, Park YR, Jung KI, et al. Refractive errors in high myopic eyes after phacovitrectomy for macular hole. Int J Ophthalmol 2015; 8(2):369-373
    27余盈盈, 黎晓新, 鲍永珍. 黄斑前膜合并白内障患者白内障超声乳化人工晶状体植入联合玻璃切割术前后屈光状态改变. 中华实验眼科杂志2014; 32(11):1025-1029
    28 Kang EC, Lee KH, Koh HJ. Comparisonofrefractive error in phacovitrectomy for epiretinal membrane using ultrasound and partial coherence interferometry. Eur J Ophthalmol 2016; 26(4):356-360
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Liang Wang, Chen-Hao Li, Fang-Yuan Cheng,/et al.Analysis on the reasons of postoperative refractive error after combined anterior and posterior segment surgery. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2020;20(11):1955-1959

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:February 25,2020
  • Revised:September 29,2020
  • Online: October 22,2020