Influence of three kinds of intraocular lens on vision and visual quality of patients with age-related cataract
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [19]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To analyze the influence of trifocal lens(AT LISA tri 839MP), Lenstec SBL-3 intraocular lens(IOL)and T SPHERIS 209M monofocal IOL implantation on vision and visual quality of patients with age-related cataract(ARC).

    METHODS: Totally 114 patients(114 eyes)with ARC undergoing elective surgical treatment in the hospital between October 2018 and April 2019 were enrolled in the prospective clinical study. They were divided into LISA tri group, SBL group and monofocal group with 38 cases(38 eyes)in each group. They were treated with trifocal IOL(AT LISA tri 839MP), Lenstec SBL-3 IOL and CT SPHERIS 209M monofocal IOL, respectively. The corneal endothelium, vision and visual quality before operation and 3mo after operation were compared.

    RESULTS:Three months after operation, no significant changes in corneal endothelial cell density(ECD), central corneal thickness(CCT)and the proportion of hexagonal cells in the three groups compared with preoperation(P>0.05), while the uncorrected distance visual acuity(UCDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity(UCIVA)and uncorrected near visual acuity(UCNVA)were significantly improved(P<0.001). UCDVA, UCIVA and UCNVA of LISA tri group were(0.11±0.03)LogMAR,(0.17±0.05)and(0.09±0.02), which of SBL group were(0.12±0.02, 0.19±0.05, 0.08±0.02), all significantly better than(0.21±0.04, 0.24±0.07, 0.15±0.03)in monofocal group(P<0.05). 3mo after operation, the near off-glasses rate and visual satisfaction in LISA tri group were 92% and 97%, which in SBL group were 95% and 92%, all significantly higher than 66% and 68% in monofocal group(P<0.017). Compared with preoperation, the visual function and quality of life(VF-QOL)scores of the three groups significantly increased(P<0.001), which were significantly higher in LISA tri group and SBL group than in monofocal group(P<0.05).

    CONCLUSION: Trifocal IOL(AT LISA tri-839MP)and Lenstec SBL-3 multifocal IOL implantation is superior to monofocal IOL in the treatment of patients with ARC, which can effectively improve vision and visual quality.

    Reference
    1周媛, 邹新蓉, 张桂芳,等. 上海奉贤东部地区65岁以上人群白内障患病率及手术现状分析. 国际眼科杂志 2018; 18(2):330-332
    2 Prasad R, Badhani A, Dogra GB. Terminal chop: New technique for full thickness nuclear segmentation in mature hard cataract. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017; 65(12):1415-1418
    3 Chen X, Yu Y, Song X, et al. Clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery for hard nuclear cataracts. J Cat Re Sur 2017; 43(4):486-491
    4 刘慧, 樊映川, 巫雷. 双通道客观视觉质量分析系统评估多焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量. 国际眼科杂志 2019; 19(4):93-97
    5 Warren H, Daniel C, Xin H, et al. Optical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 2014; 14(8):2105-2113
    6 Liu Q, Zhang S, Wang X, et al. Acute clouding of trifocal lens during implantation: a case report. BMC Ophthalmol 2017; 17(1):242
    7胡东瑞, 曾庆森, 马嘉培, 等. 区域折射型多焦点人工晶状体SBL-3的疗效观察. 国际眼科杂志 2018; 18(10):83-86
    8 Tran HM, Mahdi AM, Sivasubramaniam S, et al. Quality of life and visual function in Nigeria: findings from the National Survey of Blindness and Visual Impairment. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95(12):1646-1651
    9王潇, 陈碧超, 曹丹敏, 等. 旋转非对称折射型多焦点人工晶状体植入术后早期效果. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 2019; 21(4):259-264
    10王婷婷, 任雁琳, 崔慧娴, 等. 区域折射多焦点人工晶状体与单焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉效果以及患者满意度分析. 临床眼科杂志2019; 27(3):217-220
    11陈琛, 屈思萌, 韦秋红, 等. 区域折射型多焦人工晶状体SBL-3植入前后白内障患者视觉质量的变化分析. 中华保健医学杂志 2018; 20(6):42-45
    12凌宇, 熊飞, 于璐, 等. 多焦点人工晶体植入术后双眼离焦曲线对视觉功能的评价. 实用医学杂志 2019; 35(10):115-118
    13谢瞻, 丁宇华, 陈雪, 等. 高度近视白内障患者植入三焦点人工晶体的临床效果及生存质量观察. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)2019; 39(3):58-62
    14彭程, 周星延, 赵江月, 等. 三焦点衍射型人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量临床评价. 中国医科大学学报 2019; 48(5):7-11
    15王慧娟, 秦虹, 冯骅, 等. 区域折射型与衍射折射型多焦点人工晶状体植入术后患者视力与视觉质量对比研究. 眼科新进展 2018; 38(6):72-74
    16 Savini G, Schiano-Lomoriello D, Balducci N, et al. Visual Performance of a New Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Compared to a Distance-Dominant Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens. J Refract Surg 2018; 34(4):228-235
    17潘永明, 杨鸿飞, 殷悦. 区域折射人工晶状体SBL-3对年龄相关性白内障的治疗效果. 国际眼科杂志 2019; 19(2):91-94
    18 Xu Z, Cao D, Chen X, et al. Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12(10):e0186522
    19 Gerl M, Breyer DRH, Hagen P, et al. Clinical Comparison of a Trifocal and a Trifocal-Toric Intraocular Lens Based on the Same Diffractive Platform. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2017; 234(10):336-345
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Jing-Fei Ban, Jing-Ke Li, Li-Xia Guo. ,/et al.Influence of three kinds of intraocular lens on vision and visual quality of patients with age-related cataract. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2021;21(1):106-110

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1045
  • PDF: 1258
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:April 17,2020
  • Revised:December 09,2020
  • Online: December 22,2020