Comparison of three instruments for measuring corneal biological parameters before cataract surgery
Author:
Corresponding Author:

Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To compare the differences of corneal curvature and astigmatism measured by Pentacam, IOL Master and iTrace of cataract patients.

    METHODS:In this prospective clinical trial,68 cataract patients(82 eyes)received treatment at the ophthalmology department of our hospital. In the treatment process, used the IOL Master, Pentacam and iTrace to measure the patient's corneal curvature(K1, K2, Km)and astigmatism(J0, J45). The difference, correlation and consistence among three instruments were analysed.

    RESULTS: Differences analysis showed that in the measurement of K1, K2, Km, there was no difference among Pentacam, IOL Master and iTrace(P>0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that K1, K2, Km were highly correlated among three instruments(|r|>0.5, P<0.01). J0, J45 were moderately correlated between IOL Master and Pentacam, so as IOL Master and iTrace(0.3<|r|<0.5, P<0.01). J0, J45 were weakly correlated between Pentacam and iTrace(0.1<|r|<0.3, P<0.05). The Bland-Altman showed that the corneal curvature and astigmatism vectors examined by these three devices had non-comparable results.

    CONCLUSION: K1, K2, Km, J0, J45 were correlated among the three devices, but the three devices all cannot directly interchanged, targeted selection is required for the measuring the corneal curvature and astigmatism by these three different instruments in the actual clinical process.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Guo Chen, Xiao Li, Guang-Ying Zheng. Comparison of three instruments for measuring corneal biological parameters before cataract surgery. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2021;21(7):1261-1265

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:
  • Revised:May 28,2021
  • Adopted:
  • Online: June 24,2021
  • Published: