Comparison of efficacy of different doses of Conbercept combined with panretinal photocoagulation and EX-PRESS glaucoma shunt implantation in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [31]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of three doses of Conbercept intravitreal injection with panretinal photocoagulation(PRP)followed by EX-PRESS glaucoma shunt implantation on patients with neovascular glaucoma(NVG).

    METHODS: Prospective study. A total of 37 patients(37 eyes)with NVG from May 2018 to September 2020 were collected. All accepted intravitreal injection of Conbercept and PRP 3-5d later, and accepted EX-PRESS glaucoma shunt implantation within 1wk after surgery. They were randomly divided into the low-dose group(13 eyes), the conventional dose group(12 eyes)and the high-dose group(12 eyes)according to three doses of preoperative Conbercept intravitreal injection, and they were injected with 10mg/mL Conbercept of 0.03, 0.05 and 0.08 mL(0.3, 0.5 and 0.8 mg Conbercept contained)respectively. The regression of iris and angle neovascularization(NV)after intravitreal injection was observed in the three groups, and postoperative intraocular pressure(IOP), best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)and complications were compared among the three groups.

    RESULTS: All patients completed follow-up. Cases with NV regression of iris and angle in the high-dose group were significantly more than the low-dose group(χ2=0.132, P=0.003)and the conventional dose group(χ2=0.154, P=0.015)3-5d after intravitreal injection. BCVA and IOP of the three groups at 1, 3 and 6mo after surgery were improved compared with those before treatment. IOP of the low-dose group, the conventional dose group and the high-dose group at 12mo after surgery was 14.12±2.63, 13.37±2.18 and 12.15±1.43mmHg, respectively. IOP of the high-dose group was lower than that of the low-dose group and the conventional dose group(all P<0.05). The BCVA of the high-dose group at 12mo after surgery was better than that of the low-dose group and the conventional dose group(all P<0.05). There was no significantly statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative complications at 12mo after surgery among the three groups(P>0.05).

    CONCLUSIONS: The intravitreal injection of high-dose(0.8mg)Conbercept combined with PRP and EX-PRESS glaucoma shunt implantation has particularly significant clinical effect on the treatment of NVG.

    Reference
    1 Weiss DI, Shaffer RN, Nehrenberg TR. Neovascular glaucoma complicating carotid-cavernous fistula. Arch Ophthalmol 1963; 69(3):304-307
    2 Hayreh SS. Neovascular glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2007; 26(5):470-485
    3 Simha A, Aziz K, Braganza A, et al. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 2:CD007920
    4 Salim S. The role of the Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device in glaucoma surgery. Semin Ophthalmol 2013; 28(3):180-184
    5 Guven Yilmaz S, Yildirim S, Degirmenci C, et al. Evaluation of Ex-PRESS mini glaucoma shunt implantation with preoperative intracameral bevacizumab injection in refractory neovascular glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2016; 26(6):575-580
    6 Simsek T, Bilgeç MD. Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation versus suprachoroidal silicone tube implantation following the injection of bevacizumab into the anterior chamber in patients with neovascular glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019; 257(4):799-804
    7 Arcieri ES, Paula JS, Jorge R, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab in eyes with neovascular glaucoma undergoing Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: 2-year follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol 2015; 93(1):e1-e6
    8 Havens SJ,Gulati V. Neovascular glaucoma. Dev Ophthalmol 2016; 55: 196-204
    9 Senthil S, Dada T, Das T, et al. Neovascular glaucoma-A review. Indian J Ophthalmol 2021; 69(3):525-534
    10 Jonas JB, Yang D, Wang N. Effect of intraocular pressure on glaucomatous damage to the optic nerve. Ophthalmologe 2014; 111(2):181-188; quiz 189-190
    11 Riva I, Roberti G, Katsanos A, et al. A review of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant and comparison with other surgical operations. Adv Ther 2017; 34(4):834-847
    12 Xie Z, Liu H, Du ML, et al. Efficacy of Ahmed Glaucoma valve implantation on neovascular glaucoma. Int J Med Sci 2019; 16(10):1371-1376
    13 Kawabata K, Shobayashi K, Iwao K, et al. Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study. BMC Ophthalmol 2019; 19(1):75
    14 Altinel MG, Kanra AY, Karadag R, et al. Ex-PRESS implantation for different types of glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol 2019; 12(8):1290-1297
    15张秀兰, 王家伟. 难治性青光眼的治疗策略. 眼科 2015; 24(3):214-216
    16高传文, 陈伟, 杨潇远, 等. Ex-Press房水引流物植入术治疗新生血管性青光眼临床观察. 眼科新进展 2018; 38(8):762-765
    17 Moisseiev E, Zunz E, Tzur R, et al. Standard trabeculectomy and ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma shunt: a comparative study and literature review. J Glaucoma 2015; 24(6):410-416
    18 Shinohara Y, Akiyama H, Magori M, et al. Short-term outcomes after EX-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy alone in patients with neovascular glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol 2017; 11:2207-2213
    19孔繁学, 马翔, 范松涛, 等. 玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗和康柏西普联合青光眼引流阀植入治疗新生血管性青光眼的疗效. 吉林大学学报(医学版)2017; 43(6):1237-1242
    20贾旭,段宣初.抗血管内皮生长因子类药物在新生血管性青光眼及滤过手术抗瘢痕治疗中的应用.中华眼科杂志 2015; 51(4): 314-318
    21 Hwang HB, Lee NY. Effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor on the surgical outcome of neovascular glaucoma: an overview and meta-analysis. Medicine 2021; 100(39):e27326
    22 Shi LK, Yang J, Lin JY. What is the impactof intravitreal injection of conbercept on neovascular glaucoma patients: a prospective, interventional case series study. BMC Ophthalmol 2019; 19(1):128
    23 SooHoo JR, Seibold LK, Kahook MY. Recent advances in the management of neovascular glaucoma. Semin Ophthalmol 2013; 28(3):165-172
    24 Slabaugh M, Salim S. Use of anti-VEGF agents in glaucoma surgery. J Ophthalmol 2017; 2017:1645269
    25 Karpilova MA, Durzhinskaya MH. Anti-VEGF drugs in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Vestn Oftalmol 2019; 135(5):299-304
    26 Katsanos A, Gorgoli K, Mikropoulos DG, et al. Assessing the role of ranibizumab in improving the outcome of glaucoma filtering surgery and neovascular glaucoma. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2018; 18(6):719-724
    27 Kwon J, Sung KR. Effect of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab on the surgical outcome of neovascular glaucoma at different stages. J Ophthalmol 2017; 2017:7672485
    28 Zhou MW, Wang JW, Sun XD. Efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab in eyes with neovascular glaucoma undergoing Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: 2-year follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol 2016; 94(1):e78
    29 Sahyoun M, Azar G, Khoueir Z, et al. Long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve in association with intravitreal bevacizumab in neovascular glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2015; 24(5):383-388
    30赵媛, 余敏, 代艳, 等. 康柏西普联合EX-PRESS青光眼引流器植入对NVG患者视力及并发症的影响. 国际眼科杂志 2020; 20(10):1809-1813
    31牛童童, 邓月, 刘毅, 等. 康柏西普联合不同手术方式对新生血管性青光眼疗效观察. 国际眼科杂志 2021; 21(11):1865-1869
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Su-E Zhong, Sheng Huang, Mang-Qian Rao,/et al.Comparison of efficacy of different doses of Conbercept combined with panretinal photocoagulation and EX-PRESS glaucoma shunt implantation in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2022;22(12):2058-2062

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:361
  • PDF: 844
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:January 20,2022
  • Revised:November 18,2022
  • Online: November 29,2022