Application of 3D surgical video system and intraoperative optical coherence tomography in idiopathic epiretinal membrane vitrectomy
Author:
Fund Project:

Science and Technology Program of Urumqi Municipal Health and Wellness Commission(No.202360); Youth Cultivation Research Program of Beijing Road Medical Area, Xinjiang Military Region General Hospital(No.2022jzbj1105)

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [15]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To evaluate the application effectiveness of the 3D surgical video system and intraoperative optical coherence tomography(OCT)in idiopathic epiretinal membrane vitrectomy.

    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 61 patients(61 eyes)with idiopathic epiretinal membrane at our hospital from January 2023 to October 2023. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical methods: with 31 patients(31 eyes)who underwent surgery using the 3D surgical video system and intraoperative OCT technology in 3D group, and 30 patients(30 eyes)underwent surgery using the Resight non-contact wide-angle lens system in traditional surgery group. Surgical time, membrane peeling time were recorded, followed-up for 6 mo, post-operative best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA), intraocular pressure(IOP), central macular thickness(CMT), and complications were analyzed for the two groups.

    RESULTS:All patients successfully underwent surgery without experiencing serious intraoperative complications such as major retinal hemorrhage, retinal tears, or retinal detachment. Additionally, no postoperative complications such as endophthalmitis or secondary glaucoma occurred. The surgical duration and membrane peeling time in the 3D group were significantly shorter than those in the traditional surgery group(20.13±1.59 vs 25.97±2.09 min; 3.74±0.89 vs 8.13±1.72 min, respectively; both P<0.001). There were no significant differences in BCVA and CMT between preoperative and 1-month postoperative values for both groups of patients(both P>0.008). However, both BCVA and CMT improved significantly at 3 and 6 mo postoperatively compared to preoperative levels(both P<0.008). At 6 mo postoperatively, the BCVA in the 3D group was significantly better than that in the traditional surgery group(P=0.007). There were no significant differences in CMT or IOP between the two groups at any postoperative time point(all P>0.05).

    CONCLUSION: Both the 3D surgical video system and the traditional surgical group can treat idiopathic epiretinal membrane, but the 3D surgical video system has advantages in shortening the surgical time, improving surgical efficiency, and enhancing the precision of surgical steps during surgery with the assistance of intraoperative OCT.

    Reference
    \〖1\〗 Mao JB, Lao JM, Liu CY, et al. A study analyzing macular microvasculature features after vitrectomy using OCT angiography in patients with idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane. BMC Ophthalmol, 2020,20(1):165.
    \〖2\〗 Kam AW, Hui M, Cherepanoff S, et al. Rapid “epiretinal membrane” development following intravitreal bevacizumab for Coats' disease. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep, 2018,11:75-77.
    \〖3\〗 Azuma K, Ueta T, Eguchi S, et al. Effects of internal limiting membrane peeling combined with removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Retina, 2017,37(10):1813-1819.
    \〖4\〗 Wei WL, Lin Z, Xu MN, et al. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus nonpeeling to prevent epiretinal membrane formation following vitrectomy for posterior segment open-globe injury. J Ophthalmol, 2021,2021(28):315-318.
    \〖5\〗 Zhang T,Tang W,Xu G. Comparative Analysis of Three-Dimensional Heads-Up Vitrectomy and Traditional Microscopic Vitrectomy for Vitreoretinal Diseases.Curr Eye Res,2019,44(10):1080-1086.
    \〖6\〗 Freeman WR, Chen KC, Ho J, et al. Resolution, depth of field, and physician satisfaction during digitally assisted vitreoretinal surgery. Retina, 2019,39(9):1768-1771.
    \〖7\〗 Mao ZQ, Wu HX, Fan HM, et al. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography in idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane surgery. Int J Gen Med, 2022,15:6499-6505.
    \〖8\〗 Cai C, Sun H, Hu L, et al. Visualization of integrin molecules by fluorescence imaging and techniques. Biocell, 2021,45(2):229-257.
    \〖9\〗 Tao JW, Wu HF, Chen YQ, et al. Use of iOCT in vitreoretinal surgery for dense vitreous hemorrhage in a Chinese population. Curr Eye Res, 2019,44(2):219-224.
    \〖10\〗 Díaz-Valverde A, Wu L. To peel or not to peel the internal limiting membrane in idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Retina, 2018,38(Suppl 1):S5-S11.
    \〖11\〗 Vingopoulos F, Koulouri I, Miller JB, et al. Anatomical and functional recovery kinetics after epiretinal membrane removal. Clin Ophthalmol, 2021,15:175-181.
    \〖12\〗Shi X, Sun X. To investigate the safety and efficacy of indocyanine green-assisted vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling for treatment of idiopathic macular epiretinal membranes. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi, 2016,52(5):366-372.
    \〖13\〗 Rizzo S, Abbruzzese G, Savastano A, et al. 3d surgical viewing system in ophthalmology: perceptions of the surgical team. Retina, 2018,38(4):857-861.
    \〖14\〗 Palácios RM, de Carvalho ACM, Maia M, et al. An experimental and clinical study on the initial experiences of Brazilian vitreoretinal surgeons with heads-up surgery. Graefes Arch Exp Ophthalmol, 2019,257(3):473-483.
    \〖15\〗 Palácios RM, Maia A, Farah ME, et al. Learning curve of three-dimensional heads-up vitreoretinal surgery for treating macular holes: a prospective study. Int Ophthalmol, 2019,39(10):2353-2359.
    Cited by
Get Citation

Lyu Wenjuan, Niu Tongtong, Xiao Yun. ,/et al.Application of 3D surgical video system and intraoperative optical coherence tomography in idiopathic epiretinal membrane vitrectomy. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2025;25(1):122-127

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:May 28,2024
  • Revised:November 28,2024
  • Online: December 17,2024