Correlation of pattern reversal visual evoked potential parameters with the pattern standard deviation in primary open angle glaucoma
Author:
Contact Author:

Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:


Conflicts of Interest: Kothari R, None; Bokariya P, None; Singh R, None; Singh S, None; Narang P, None.

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM:To evaluate whether glaucomatous visual field defect particularly the pattern standard deviation (PSD) of Humphrey visual field could be associated with visual evoked potential (VEP) parameters of patients having primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).METHODS:Visual field by Humphrey perimetry and simultaneous recordings of pattern reversal visual evoked potential (PRVEP) were assessed in 100 patients with POAG. The stimulus configuration for VEP recordings consisted of the transient pattern reversal method in which a black and white checker board pattern was generated (full field) and displayed on VEP monitor (colour 14”) by an electronic pattern regenerator inbuilt in an evoked potential recorder (RMS EMG EP MARK II).RESULTS:The results of our study indicate that there is a highly significant (P<0.001) negative correlation of P100 amplitude and a statistically significant (P<0.05) positive correlation of N70 latency, P100 latency and N155 latency with the PSD of Humphrey visual field in the subjects of POAG in various age groups as evaluated by Student’s t-test.CONCLUSION:Prolongation of VEP latencies were mirrored by a corresponding increase of PSD values. Conversely, as PSD increases the magnitude of VEP excursions were found to be diminished.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Ruchi Kothari, Pradeep Bokariya, Ramji Singh, et al. Correlation of pattern reversal visual evoked potential parameters with the pattern standard deviation in primary open angle glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol, 2014,7(2):326-329

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:April 10,2013
  • Revised:August 22,2013
  • Adopted:August 22,2013
  • Online: April 23,2014
  • Published: