Analysis of glistenings in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses on visual performance
Author:
Contact Author:

Affiliation:

State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

Supported bythe Science and Technology Plan of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China (No.2006B36006005)
Conflicts of Interest: Xi L, None; Liu Y, None; Zhao F, None; Chen C, None; Cheng B, None.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The authors thank Sherrina Patel for her helpful revision of the manuscript and thank the patients for their participant in the study.

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM:To assess patients’ visual performance with glistenings in one piece soft hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) (Alcon) 2 years postoperatively.METHODS:This cross section trial included 120 eyes with one piece IOL at 2 years postoperatively. Glistening was classified in 4 groups, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (most evident) according to their severity in IOLs optics observed under a slit lamp. All eyes underwent a uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity evaluation (UCVA and BCVA, LogMAR scale), a complete clinical examination, a contrast sensitivity (CS) evaluation by F.A.C.T chart, and a visual field test by Humphrey Field AnalyzerⅡ(HFA). One-way ANOVA was used for quantitative data, while Pearson χ2 test was used for qualitative data to analyze the visual function of 4 glistening groups.RESULTS: Totally 120 eyes were enrolled with 30 eyes in each glistening group. There was no statistical correlation between glistening grades and patients’ age, IOLs power, postoperative UCVA and BCVA (P>0.05). Quantificationally, CS values among each group were not statistically different. However, qualitative analysis showed there were more eyes in grade 3 group than in grade 0 group having abnormally declined CS at high spatial frequency (10% vs 36.7% at 18 cpd, P=0.029; 6.7% vs 26.7% at 12 cpd, P=0.013). Mean deviation (MD) of the visual field test was -2.14±2.31, -1.97±2.23, -3.02±3.17, -4.12±3.38 in group 0 to 3 respectively. There was a significant decrease in the most serious glistenings group (P =0.018).CONCLUSION:Glistenings may potentially have an impact on contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequencyand MD in visual field test.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Lei Xi, Yi Liu, Feng Zhao, et al. Analysis of glistenings in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses on visual performance. Int J Ophthalmol, 2014,7(3):445-451

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:January 04,2014
  • Revised:April 05,2014
  • Adopted:April 05,2014
  • Online: June 24,2014
  • Published: