A near-vision chart for children aged 3-5 years old:new designs and clinical applications
Author:
Affiliation:

1Biomedical Engineering Institute of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi Province, China;
2Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241001, Anhui Province, China;
3Department of Ophthalmology, the Second People’s Hospital of Anqing, Anqing 246004, Anhui Province, China

Fund Project:


Conflicts of Interest: Huang YQ, None;Huang H, None;Huang RZ,None.

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [24]
  • |
  • Related
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM:To introduce a new near-vision chart for children aged 3-5 years old and its clinical applications.METHODS:The new near-vision chart which combined the Bailey-Lovie layout with a newly devised set of symmetry symbols was designed based on Weber-Fechner law. It consists of 15 rows of symmetry symbols, corresponding to a visual acuity range from 1.3 to 0.1 logMAR. The optotypes were red against a white background and were specially shaped four basic geometric symbols:circle, square, triangle,and cross, which matched the preschool children''s cognitive level. A regular geometric progression of the optotype sizes and distribution was employed to arrange in 15 lines. The progression rate of the optotype size between two lines was 1.2589 and two smaller groups of optotypes ranging from 0.7 to -0.1 logMAR were included for repetitive testing. A near visual acuity was recorded in logMAR or decimal, and the testing distance was 25 cm.RESULTS:This new near-vision chart with pediatric acuity test optotypes which consists of 4 different symbols (triangle, square, cross, and circle) met the national and international eye chart design guidelines. When performing the near visual acuity assessment in preschoolers (3-5 years old). It overcame an inability to recognize the letters of the alphabet and difficulties in designating the direction of black abstract symbols such as the tumbling ''E'' or Landolt ''C'', which the subjects were prone to lose interest in. Near vision may be recorded in different notations:decimal acuity and logMAR. These two notations can be easily converted each other in the new near-vision chart. The measurements of this new chart not only showed a significant correlation and a good consistency with the Chinese national standard logarithmic near-vision chart (r=0.932, P<0.01), but also indicated good test-retest reliability (89% of retest scores were within 0.1 logMAR units of the initial test score) and a high response rate.CONCLUSION:The results of this study support the validity and reliability of near visual acuity measurements using the new near-vision chart in children aged 3-5y over a wide range of visual acuities, and the new eye chart was especially suitable for the detection of amblyopia risk factors and low vision examination in children (3-5y of age). It can be applied in routine clinical practice.

    Reference
    1 Ciner EB, Dobson V, Schmidt PP, Allen D, Cyert L,Maguire M, Moore B, Orel-Bixler D, Schultz J. A survey of vision screening policy of preschool children in the United States. Sury of ophthalmol 1999;43(5):445-457
    2 Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine of American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Ophthalmology of American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Certified Orthoptists, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, American Academy of Ophthalmology. Eye examination in infants, children, and young adults by pediatricians. Pediatrics 2003; 111(4):902- 907
    3 Huang RZ. Design of visual acuity chart for preschool children. Anhui Medical Journal 1983;4(3):184-185
    4 Changqing. Psychology of preschool children. Nanchang:Jiangxi Universities Associated Press 2009:91-95
    5 Wang YX, Yue HL. Psychological and behavioral observations of children. Shanghai:Shanghai Science & Technology Publishing House 2011:127
    6 International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Ophthalmic Optics Visual Acuity Testing Standard Optotype and its Presentation. Geneva, Switzerland, ISO, 2009;(ISO 8596:2009)
    7 Beck RW, Moke PS, Turpin AH, Ferris FL3rd, SanGiovanni JP, Johnson CA, Birch EE, Chandler DL, Cox TA, Blair RC, Kraker RT. A computerized method of visual acuity testing:adaptation of the early treatment diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. Am J of Ophthalmol 2003;135(2):194-205
    8 Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976;53(11):740-745
    9 Moke PS, Turpin AH, Beck RW, Holmes JM, Repka MX, Birch EE, Hertle RW, Kraker RT, Miller JM, Johnson CA. Computerized Method of Visual Acuity Testing:Adaptation of the Amblyopia Treatment Study Visual Acuity Testing Protocol. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132(6):903-909
    10 Miller JM, Dobson V, Harvey EM, Sherrill DL. Comparison of preschool vision screening methods in a population with a high prevalence of astigmatism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42(5):917–924
    11 Chaplin PK, Bradford GE. A historical review of distance vision screening eye charts:what to toss, what to keep, and what to replace. NASN Sch Nurse 2011; 26(7):221-228
    12 Robert J. Snowden, Peter Thompson, Tom Troscianko. Basic vision:an introduction to visual perception. Oxford University Press2006:218
    13. Gr?f MH, Becker R, Kaufmann H. Lea symbols:visual acuity assessment and detection of amblyopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238(1):53-58
    14 Ariyasu RG, Lee PP, Linton KP, LaBree LD, Azen SP, Siu AL. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values of Screening Tests for Eye Conditions in a Clinic-based Population. Ophthalmology 1996;103(11):1751-1760
    15 Vodicka I. Basic principles of physics in optical imaging of the human. eye. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) Suppl 2000;43(2):73-117
    16 George Smith, David A. Atchison. The Eye and Visual Optical Instruments. Cambridge University Press1997:568
    17 Chen AH, O’Leary DJ, Howell ER. Near visual function in young children. Part I:near point of convergence. Part II:amplitude of accommodation. Part III:near heterophoria. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2000;20(3):185-198
    18 Heinrich SP, Kruger K, Bach, M. The dynamics of practice effects in an optotype acuity task. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249(9):1319-1326
    19 National Standard of the People’s Republic of China GB11533-2011, Standard for logarithmic visual acuity charts. Beijing:China Zhijian Publishing House 2011:1-10
    20 Wu LJ. Developmental Psychology of Preschool Children. Fujian Fuzhou:People’s Publishing House 2010:92-93
    21 Hyv?rinen L, N?s?nen R, Laurinen P. New visual acuity test for preschool children. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1980;58(4):507–511
    22 Milanich, A I. New optotypes for checking visual acuity. Measurement Techniques 2013;51(8):865-867
    23 Pointer, Jonathan S. Recognition versus Resolution:a Comparison of Visual Acuity Results Using Two Alternative Test Chart Optotype, Journal of Optometry 2008;1(2):65-70
    24 Ricci F, Cedrone C, Cerull i L. Standardized measurement of visual acuity. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1998;5(1):41-53
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Yang-Qing Huang, He Huang, Rong-Zhi Huang. ,/et al.A near-vision chart for children aged 3-5 years old:new designs and clinical applications. Int J Ophthalmol, 2014,7(3):457-462

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:October 25,2013
  • Revised:December 29,2013
  • Adopted:December 29,2013
  • Online: March 18,2014