Prevalence of visual impairment and refractive errors in an urban area of Mexico
Author:
Corresponding Author:

Isabel Signes-Soler. Calle Corbeta 6, 03710 Calp, Alicante, Spain. isabel@onvivim.com

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [39]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To determine the distribution of refractive errors in a school-age population in Quintana Roo (Mexico) in the framework of an international cooperation campaign for the prevention of blindness. METHODS: A sample of 2647 school-age children (ranging from 5 to 14 years old) with a mean age of 9.1±1.9 years old were tested by trained volunteers for distance visual acuity (VA) and refractive errors. The first screening examination included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and VA with a +2.00 D lens. Inclusion criteria for a second complete cycloplegic eye examination performed by an optometrist were UDVA <20/25 (0.10 logMAR or 0.8 decimal) and/or VA with +2.00 D ≥20/25. RESULTS: A total of 633 (23.9%) children underwent the second complete eye examination. Mean logMAR UDVA was 0.035±0.094 (range 1.00 to 0.00 logMAR) for the right eyes and 0.036±0.160 (range 1.00 to 0.00 logMAR) for the left eyes. Bilateral amblyopia was found in 17 children (2.7% of refracted eyes; 0.64% of the total). The main reason for visual impairment (VI) in the sample analyzed was found to be refractive errors. In 12 children (1.9% of refracted eyes; 0.45% of the total) the VI was bilateral and 9 (1.4% of refracted eyes; 0.34% of the total) achieved a corrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better in both eyes. Mean magnitude of sphere and refractive cylinder was +0.20±0.96 D and -0.43±0.85 D in right eyes, and +0.24±1.08 and -0.43±0.83 D in left eyes. The proportion of myopic eyes [standard equivalent (SE) ≤-0.50 D] was 4.6% of the whole sample (5290 eyes). The mean magnitude of myopia was -0.84±3.44 D for the right eyes and -0.82±5.21 D for the left eyes. The proportion of hyperopic patients (SE≥+2.00 D) was 2.4% (15/633), which corresponded to 0.60% of the whole sample (32/5290 eyes). No statistically significant correlation of age to manifest sphere or cylinder was found. CONCLUSION: VI due to uncorrected refractive errors can be easily corrected with glasses but it is still a burden to be treated. Myopia is prevalent in this sample. More efforts towards correcting uncorrected refractive errors are needed.

    Reference
    1 Naidoo KS, Leasher J, Bourne RR, Flaxman SR, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Limburg H, Pesudovs K, Price H, White RA, Wong TY, Taylor HR, Resnikoff S; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Global vision impairment and blindness due to uncorrected refractive error, 1990-2010. Optom Vis Sci 2016;93(3):227-234.
    2 Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96(5):614-618.
    3 Jaggernath J, Naidoo K. Uncorrected refractive errors. Indian J Ophthalmol 2012;60(5):432.
    4 Fricke TR, Holden BA, Wilson DA, Schlenther G, Naidoo KS, Resnikoff S, Frick KD. Global cost of correcting vision impairment from uncorrected refractive error. Bull World Health Organ 2012;90(10): 728-738.
    5 Chan VF, Mebrahtu G, Ramson P, Wepo M, Naidoo KS. Prevalence of refractive error and spectacle coverage in Zoba Ma’ekel Eritrea: a rapid assessment of refractive error. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2013;20(3):131-137.
    6 Lou LX, Yao CL, Jin YH, Perez V, Ye J. Global patterns in health burden of uncorrected refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57(14): 6271-6277.
    7 Courtright P, Hutchinson AK, Lewallen S. Visual impairment in children in middle- and lower-income countries. Arch Dis Child 2011;96(12): 1129-1134.
    8 Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ 2008;86(1):63-70.
    9 Programme UND. Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/all/themes/hdr_theme/country-notes/MEX.pdf.
    10 Lanzafame F, Quartesan A. Pobreza en áreas centrales urbanas. Manual de consulta para profesiones: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; 2009.
    11 Muñoz B, West SK. Blindness and visual impairment in the Americas and the Caribbean. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86(5):498-504.
    12 Gomez-Salazar F, Campos-Romero A, Gomez-Campaña H, et al. Refractive errors among children, adolescents and adults attending eye clinics in Mexico. Int J Ophthalmol 2017;10(5):796-802.
    13 He MG, Huang WY, Zheng YF, Huang L, Ellwein LB. Refractive error and visual impairment in school children in rural southern China. Ophthalmology 2007;114(2):374-382.
    14 Negrel AD, Maul E, Pokharel GP, Zhao J, Ellwein LB. Refractive Error Study in Children: sampling and measurement methods for a multi-country survey. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129(4):421-426.
    15 WHO. Subjective assessment of visual functioning and disability weights. Geneva: WHO; Document WHO_PBL_03 91 2003; 2003.
    16 WHO. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10). Visual impairment including blindness; 2016.
    17 Secretaria de Desarrollo Social de México. https://www.gob.mx/sedesol; 2018.
    18 Murthy GV. Vision testing for refractive errors in schools: ‘screening’ programmes in schools. Community Eye Health 2000;13(33):3-5.
    19 Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Yekta A, Pakzad R, Ostadimoghaddam H, Khabazkhoob M. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Curr Ophthalmol 2018;30(1):3-22.
    20 Villarreal GM, Ohlsson J, Cavazos H, Abrahamsson M, Mohamed JH. Prevalence of myopia among 12- to 13-year-old schoolchildren in northern Mexico. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80(5):369-373.
    21 Signes-Soler I, Hernández-Verdejo JL, Estrella Lumeras MA, Tomás Verduras E, Piñero DP. Refractive error study in young subjects: results from a rural area in Paraguay. Int J Ophthalmol 2017;10(3):467-472.
    22 Signes-Soler I, Piñero DP, Javaloy J. Prevalence of visual problems in a rural population of Kenya. Acta Ophthalmol 2013;91(2):e165-e166.
    23 Choong YF, Chen AH, Goh PP. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142(1):68-74.
    24 Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 2016;123(5):1036-1042.
    25 Rodriguez NM, Romero AF. The prevalence of refractive conditions in Puerto Rican adults attending an eye clinic system. J Optom 2014;7(3): 161-167.
    26 Ferraz FH, Corrente JE, Opromolla P, Padovani CR, Schellini SA. Refractive errors in a Brazilian population: age and sex distribution. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015;35(1):19-27.
    27 Hendler K, Mehravaran S, Lu X, Brown SI, Mondino BJ, Coleman AL. Refractive errors and amblyopia in the UCLA preschool vision program; first year results. Am J Ophthalmol 2016;172:80-86.
    28 Carter MJ, Lansingh VC, Schacht G, Río del Amo M, Scalamogna M, France TD. Visual acuity and refraction by age for children of three different ethnic groups in Paraguay. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2013;76(2):94-97.
    29 Galvis V, Tello A, Otero J, Serrano AA, Gómez LM, Camacho PA, López-Jaramillo JP. Prevalence of refractive errors in Colombia: MIOPUR study. Br J Ophthalmol 2018;102(10):1320-1323.
    30 Harrington SC, Stack J, Saunders K, O’Dwyer V. Refractive error and visual impairment in Ireland schoolchildren. Br J Ophthalmol 2019;103(8):1112-1118.
    31 Williams KM, Bertelsen G, Cumberland P, et al; European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium. Increasing prevalence of myopia in Europe and the impact of education. Ophthalmology 2015;122(7):1489-1497.
    32 Wang SK, Guo YF, Liao CM, Chen YX, Su GX, Zhang GH, Zhang L, He MG. Incidence of and factors associated with myopia and high myopia in Chinese children, based on refraction without cycloplegia. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018;136(9):1017-1024.
    33 Lim DH, Han JS, Chung TY, Kang S, Yim HW; Epidemiologic Survey Committee of the Korean Ophthalmologic Society. The high prevalence of myopia in Korean children with influence of parental refractive errors: The 2008-2012 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS One 2018;13(11):e0207690.
    34 Pan CW, Qian DJ, Saw SM. Time outdoors, blood vitamin D status and myopia: a review. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2017;16(3):426-432.
    35 Sheeladevi S, Seelam B, Nukella PB, Modi A, Ali R, Keay L. Prevalence of refractive errors in children in India: a systematic review. Clin Exp Optom 2018;101(4):495-503.
    36 Li T, Zhou XD, Chen XF, Qi HH, Gao QL. Refractive error in Chinese preschool children: the Shanghai study. Eye Contact Lens 2019;45(3):182-187.
    37 Alabi AS, Aribaba OT, Alabi AO, Ilo O, Onakoya AO, Akinsola FB. Visual impairment and ocular morbidities among schoolchildren in Southwest, Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 2018;25(3):166-171.
    38 Pan CW, Chen XJ, Zhu H, Fu ZJ, Zhong H, Li J, Huang D, Liu H. School-based assessment of amblyopia and strabismus among multiethnic children in rural China. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):13410.
    39 Xiao O, Morgan IG, Ellwein LB, He MG; Refractive Error Study in Children Study Group. Prevalence of amblyopia in school-aged children and variations by age, gender, and ethnicity in a multi-country refractive error study. Ophthalmology 2015;122(9):1924-1931.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Isabel Signes-Soler, David P Pi&#;ero, Milagro Inés Murillo,/et al.Prevalence of visual impairment and refractive errors in an urban area of Mexico. Int J Ophthalmol, 2019,12(10):1612-1617

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1290
  • PDF: 744
  • HTML: 364
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:December 01,2018
  • Revised:August 03,2019
  • Online: October 18,2019