目的:对单纯引线型硅胶管植入与引线型硅胶管植入联合激光治疗泪小管阻塞进行观察,比较两组之间的临床疗效。方法:将患者随机分为两组,一组单纯采用引线型硅胶管植入的方法(A组);另一组采用泪道激光联合引线型硅胶管植入的方法(B组)。结果:单纯引线型硅胶管植入治疗泪小管阻塞治愈率为77.6%,泪道激光联合引线型硅胶管植入治疗泪小管阻塞治愈率为87.5%。结论:泪道激光联合引线型硅胶管植入治疗泪小管阻塞治愈率更高,优势更明显。

·AIM:To compare the clinical efficacy of implantation of lead-type silicone tubes combined with or without laser treatment for lacrimal duct obstruction.METHODS:The patients were randomly divided into two groups,one group were implanted with lead-type silicone tube only(A group);another group underwent the laser treatment combined with implantation of lead-type silicone tube(B group).RESULTS:The cure rate of lead-type silicone tube implantation for lacrimal duct obstruction was 77.6%,the cure rate of laser treatment combined with lead-type silicone tube implantation for lacrimal duct obstruction was 87.5%.CONCLUSION:The laser treatment combined with lead-type silicone tube implantation has a higher cure rate of lacrimal duct obstruction,and more obvious advantages.

R779.6