引线型硅胶管植入联合激光与否治疗泪小管阻塞的疗效比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R779.6

基金项目:


Clinical analysis of the implantation of lead-type silicone tube combined with or without laser for lacrimal duct obstruction
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:对单纯引线型硅胶管植入与引线型硅胶管植入联合激光治疗泪小管阻塞进行观察,比较两组之间的临床疗效。方法:将患者随机分为两组,一组单纯采用引线型硅胶管植入的方法(A组);另一组采用泪道激光联合引线型硅胶管植入的方法(B组)。结果:单纯引线型硅胶管植入治疗泪小管阻塞治愈率为77.6%,泪道激光联合引线型硅胶管植入治疗泪小管阻塞治愈率为87.5%。结论:泪道激光联合引线型硅胶管植入治疗泪小管阻塞治愈率更高,优势更明显。

    Abstract:

    ·AIM:To compare the clinical efficacy of implantation of lead-type silicone tubes combined with or without laser treatment for lacrimal duct obstruction.METHODS:The patients were randomly divided into two groups,one group were implanted with lead-type silicone tube only(A group);another group underwent the laser treatment combined with implantation of lead-type silicone tube(B group).RESULTS:The cure rate of lead-type silicone tube implantation for lacrimal duct obstruction was 77.6%,the cure rate of laser treatment combined with lead-type silicone tube implantation for lacrimal duct obstruction was 87.5%.CONCLUSION:The laser treatment combined with lead-type silicone tube implantation has a higher cure rate of lacrimal duct obstruction,and more obvious advantages.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张婧,孙广莉,朱豫.引线型硅胶管植入联合激光与否治疗泪小管阻塞的疗效比较.国际眼科杂志, 2011,11(3):500-501.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码