AIM:To observe the clinical curative effects of different methods for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma.

METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2012, 140(140 eyes)patients with neovascular glaucoma were selected as the research objects in our hospital. We made a retrospection analysis and they were randomly divided into group A(simplex small beam resection group)20 cases 20 eyes, group B(small beam resection and iris circumference resection group)19 cases 19 eyes, group C(ciliary body laser light coagulation surgery group)42 cases 42 eyes, group D(ciliary body condensation surgery)44 cases 44 eyes, group E(intravitreal medicine injection group)15 cases 15 eyes. The intraocular pressure, vision and clinical effects before and after the surgery were analyzed comprehensively

RESULTS: The combination study of the groups: the differences were statistically significant when compared postoperative intraocular pressure recovery after surgery with before the treatment in each group(P<0.05). In group A, 20 eyes efficiency was 60.0%, group B 19 eyes efficiency was 84.2%, group C 42 eyes efficiency was 71.4%, group D 44 eyes efficiency was 54.5%, group E 15 eyes efficiency was 40.0%. Because the cases in some of the groups were less, there were no statistical significance when compare between them(P>0.05). The results of visual recovery were compared with that of prior treatment, the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).

CONCLUSION: For different conditions of patients with neovascular glaucoma, we can use different surgical methods. The recovery of visual functions for patients was the primary objective.