两种手术方法治疗慢性泪囊炎的疗效对比
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Effects comparison of two operation methods in treatment of dacryocystitis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较鼻腔泪囊吻合术(EDCR)及鼻内镜下鼻腔泪囊造孔术(IEDCR)联合泪道置管的疗效,探讨治疗泪囊炎的最佳手术方法。

    方法:随机将门诊确诊的慢性泪囊炎患者37例37眼分为两组,分别采用上述两种手术方法治疗,术后随访6~12mo观察手术疗效。

    结果:IEDCR组17眼,有效16眼,好转1眼,总有效率为94%; EDCR组20眼,有效18例,好转2眼,总有效率为90%。EDCR组与IEDCR组之间有效率无显著性差异(P>0.05)。IEDCR组术后反应轻,面部无瘢痕,恢复较快。EDCR组术后反应重,面部留有瘢痕,恢复较慢。

    结论:EDCR和IEDCR均是治疗慢性泪囊炎的可靠方法,但IEDCR微创术后反应及疗效好,值得推广应用。

    Abstract:

    AIM: To investigate the effects on patients with chronic dacryocystitis treated with two methods: external dacryocystorhinostomy(EDCR)and intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy(IEDCR)combined with intubation of lacrimal ducts, and to explore the best operation method.

    METHODS: Totally 37 cases(37 eyes)were randomly divided into two groups, using EDCR and IEDCR respectively, postoperative follow-up lasted 6~12mo.

    RESULTS: The success rate of IEDCR group and EDCR group were 94%(17 eyes)and 90%(20 eyes)respectively. There was no significant difference between EDCR group and IEDCR group(P>0.05). There were Slighter postoperative reaction, no postoperative scar, faster postoperative recovery in IEDCR group than those in EDCR group.

    CONCLUSION: EDCR and IEDCR were effective methods. Especially IEDCR is minimal invasive technique and worthy of promotion and application.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

周进,孔庆健,李滨.两种手术方法治疗慢性泪囊炎的疗效对比.国际眼科杂志, 2015,15(3):565-566.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-17
  • 最后修改日期:2015-02-28
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-03-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码