“多元化二段式”教学模式在眼科学专业硕士研究生培养中的实践应用
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助(No.81160118,81400372,81660158); 江西省自然科学基金重大项目(No.20161ACB21017); 江西省自然科学基金(No.20151BAB215016); 江西省重点研发项目(No.20151BBG70223); 江西省学位与研究生教育教学改革研究项目(No.JXYJG-2018-013,JXYJG-2018-016)


Practical application of “diversified two-stage” teaching mode in the cultivation of master students in ophthalmology
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81160118, 81400372, 81660158); Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation Major Project(No.20161ACB21017)Jiangxi Natural Science Foundation(No.20151BAB215016); Jiangxi Key Research and Development Project(No.20151BBG70223); Research Project on Teaching Reform of Degree and Postgraduate Education in Jiangxi Province(No.JXYJG-2018-013, JXYJG-2018-016)Co-first authors: Qing Yuan and Rong-Bin Liang.

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨“多元化二段式”教学模式在眼科学专业硕士研究生培养中的应用效果。

    方法:选取32名2017届、2018届和2019届的眼科学专业硕士研究生,将每届研究生都随机均分为研究组和对照组(各16人)。研究组采用“多元化二段式”教学模式进行教学; 对照组采用传统教学模式进行教学。同组不同届研究生的教学内容相同,教学老师相同,教学时间为33mo的临床实践期,研究时间为2014~2019年,通过对研究组和对照组的眼科学专业硕士研究生的临床实践进行对比,从临床专业考核、科研能力考核、综合考核成绩、学生满意度及梦焦虑自评分数来分析“多元化二段式”教学模式与传统教学模式的不同。考试内容相同,评分标准统一。

    结果:研究组满意度评分为101.38±6.29分,综合成绩84.22±4.58分,梦焦虑评分17.31±5.20分; 对照组满意度评分为59.13±9.61分,综合成绩75.72±5.14分,梦焦虑评分25.75±3.32分。研究组临床技能、科研创新、综合成绩的评分均高于对照组,而梦焦虑评分低于对照组(均P<0.05)。梦焦虑评分与教学模式满意度评分、学生满意度评分呈负相关(r=-0.746、-0.618,均P<0.05)。

    结论:“多元化二段式”教学模式相较于传统教学模式提高了眼科学专业硕士研究生理论知识、科研创新、身心健康等的综合素质,是目前眼科学专业硕士研究生教学的最佳模式。

    Abstract:

    AIM: To explore the application effect of “diversified two-stage” teaching mode in the cultivation of master students in ophthalmology.

    METHODS: A total of thirty-two master students of ophthalmology from 2017 to 2019 were randomly divided into 2 groups, 16 in each group. The study group used the “diversified two-stage” teaching mode; the control group used the traditional teaching mode. The teaching content of the same group of graduate students is the same, the teaching teachers are the same, the teaching period was 33mo of clinical practice, the research time is from 2014 to 2019, the differences between the two groups were compared in the clinical professional assessment, scientific research ability assessment, comprehensive assessment, student satisfaction and dream anxiety self-rating scores with the same examination content and the uniform scoring standard.

    RESULTS: The average score of student satisfaction in the study group is(101.38±6.29), the comprehensive assessment is 84.22±4.58, and the dream anxiety score is 17.31±5.20. The average score of satisfaction in the control group is 59.13±9.61, the comprehensive assessment is 75.72±5.14, and the dream anxiety score is 25.75±3.32. The scores of clinical professional assessment, scientific research ability assessment and comprehensive assessment in the study group were higher than the control group, while the dream anxiety score was lower than the control group(both P<0.05). The dream anxiety score was negatively correlated with the teaching model satisfaction score and the student satisfaction score(r=-0.746, -0.618, both P<0.05).

    CONCLUSION: The “diversified two-stage” teaching mode improves the comprehensive quality of master students' theoretical knowledge, scientific research innovation, physical and mental health. It is the best teaching mode for the master students in ophthalmology.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

袁晴,梁荣斌,林启,等.“多元化二段式”教学模式在眼科学专业硕士研究生培养中的实践应用.国际眼科杂志, 2019,19(11):1950-1954.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-16
  • 最后修改日期:2019-10-10
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-10-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码