中西医结合治疗外伤性视神经病变疗效评价的Meta分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(No.81874491); 北京市科学技术委员会资助项目(No.Z171100001017206)


Meta-analysis of efficacy evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine combined with Western medicine in the treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81874491); Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission(No.Z171100001017206)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:系统评价中西医结合治疗外伤性视神经病变(TON)的临床疗效及安全性。

    方法:通过计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库、维普数据库自建库至2020-05的关于中西医结合与单纯西医治疗TON的随机对照研究,使用Cochrane评价手册对纳入文献进行质量评价,使用RevMan5.3统计软件进行资料提取与Meta分析。

    结果:共筛选出12篇符合纳入、排除标准的文献; Meta分析结果显示,与单纯西药治疗TON比较,中西医结合治疗有效率更高\〖RR=1.33,95%CI(1.23~1.45),P<0.001\〗; 在改善视力\〖MD=0.18,95%CI(0.14~0.23),P<0.001\〗、视野平均缺损\〖MD=-3.08,95%CI(-5.20~0.96),P=0.004\〗、视觉诱发电位P100波峰潜时\〖MD=-9.47,95%CI(-16.37~2.57),P=0.007\〗以及视觉诱发电位P100波峰振幅\〖MD=1.44,95%CI(0.22~2.66),P=0.02\〗上作用更显著。纳入文献有2篇提及不良反应的发生和处理,余10篇均未描述。

    结论:与单纯西医治疗相比,中西医结合治疗TON的疗效更佳。

    Abstract:

    AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine combined with Western medicine(TCM-WM)in the treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy(TON).

    METHODS:The computer searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database(CBM), Wan-Fang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)database and Weipu database. Search time was limited from their inception to May 2020. A comprehensive search strategy was designed to identify all randomized controlled trials(RCTs)comparing TCM-WM therapy versus WM therapy alone. The methodological quality of the included trials was assessed by the quality grade evaluation used in Cochrane handbook. Data extraction and Meta-analysis were performed by RevMan5.3 statistical software.

    RESULTS: Twelve RCTs were included. The Meta-analysis showed that compared with the WM therapy alone in treating TON, TCM-WM therapy was better in improving the effective rate \〖RR=1.33, 95% CI(1.23-1.45), P<0.001\〗, visual acuity \〖MD=0.18,95% CI(0.14-0.23), P<0.001\〗, visual field mean defect \〖MD=-3.08, 95% CI(-5.20-0.96), P=0.004\〗, P100 lantency \〖MD=-9.47, 95% CI(-16.37-2.57), P=0.007\〗 as well as P100 amplitude \〖MD=1.44, 95% CI (0.22-2.66), P=0.02\〗. Two researches reported the occurrence and treatment of adverse reactions, and the remaining included researches did not report the adverse reactions.

    CONCLUSION:The TCM-WM therapy in treating TON is more effective compared with the WM therapy alone.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴琼,周剑,韦企平,等.中西医结合治疗外伤性视神经病变疗效评价的Meta分析.国际眼科杂志, 2021,21(2):279-284.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-26
  • 最后修改日期:2020-12-29
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-01-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码