可疑性原发性房角关闭和原发性房角关闭与PACG解剖结构的比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Anatomical structure comparison of primary angle closure suspects, primary angle closure and primary angle-closure glaucoma
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨可疑性原发性房角关闭(primary angle closure suspect,PACS)、原发性房角关闭(primary angle closure,PAC)及原发性闭角型青光眼(primary angle-closure glaucoma, PACG)解剖结构的异同。

    方法:采用国际区域性流行病学眼科学会(International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology,ISGEO)的分类系统,分为4组:正常对照组(47例47眼)、PACS组(157例157眼),PAC组(96例96眼)及PACG组(86例86眼)。应用NIDEK Echoscan US-1800型A型超声测量系统对被测者眼部解剖结构(前房深度、晶状体厚度、眼轴长度、晶状体相对位置)进行测量,各项均值进行组间差异比较。

    结果:正常人、PACS和PAC与PACG的年龄、晶状体厚度依次增高(P<0.05),前房深度、晶状体相对位置依次递减(P<0.05); 与正常人相比,PACS和PAC与PACG除眼轴外其余的参数都有差异(P<0.05); 与PACG相比,正常人、PACS和PAC的解剖结构参数都存在差异(P<0.05); 但PAC与PACG两组相比,除前房深度、晶状体相对位置外,其余的各项解剖参数相比无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

    结论:从正常人、PACS、PAC到PACG的前房深度变浅、眼轴变短、晶状体相对位置靠前。前房深度、晶状体相对位置对PACG的早期诊断及预防有一定的临床价值。

    Abstract:

    AIM: To discuss the anatomical structure of the patients with normal group, primary angle closure suspects(PACS), primary angle closure(PAC)and primary angle-closure glaucoma(PACG).

    METHODS: All persons were divided into four groups according International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology(ISGEO)classification methods: normal group, PACS group, PAC group, PACG group. Anatomical structures including the anterior chamber depth(ACD), lens thickness(LT), the axial length(AL)and relative location of lens(RLL)were measured by a contact ultrasound A-scan biometry device(NIDEK, Echoscan US-1800)in 47 eyes of 47 normal persons, 157 eyes 157 of patients with PAC, 96 eyes of 96 patients with PAC and 86 eyes of 86 patients with PACG.

    RESULTS: The age, LT were gradually increased from PACS, PAC to PACG, but the ACD, RLL gradually were decreased(P<0.05). There were significant differences in ACD, LT and RLL between normal group and other groups(P<0.05). ALL anatomical items were different between PACG and other groups(P<0.05). Compared with PAC, PACG had significant differences in ACD and ALL(P<0.05), but other items had no difference.

    CONCLUSION: The anatomical characteristics gradually progress from PACS, PAC to PACG. The ACD, RLL can be an indicator in clinical practice for earlier PACG diagnosis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

范肃洁,郭黎霞,崔宏宇,等.可疑性原发性房角关闭和原发性房角关闭与PACG解剖结构的比较.国际眼科杂志, 2013,13(2):367-369.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-14
  • 最后修改日期:2013-01-08
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: