Goldmann眼压计与非接触眼压计测量青光眼患者眼压的对比分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of two methods of tonometry in glaucoma patients: Goldmann applanation tonometer and non-contact tonometer
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:对比分析Goldmann压平式眼压计(Goldmann applanation tonometer, GAT)和非接触眼压计(non-contact tonometer,NCT)测量青光眼患者眼压的结果,寻找其规律性。

    方法:分别使用GAT和NCT测量108例206眼青光眼患者的眼压。

    结果:青光眼患者108例206眼的平均眼压:GAT测量为29.77±10.27mmHg,NCT测量为24.59±8.58mmHg,两者比较存在显著性差异(P<0.01),而且眼压越高,差异性越显著。

    结论:NCT测量值较GAT测量值低,眼压越高,差值越大。建议使用GAT检查青光眼患者的眼压,以免漏诊和贻误治疗。

    Abstract:

    AIM: To compare the two methods for the measurement of glaucoma patients' intraocular pressure(IOP)between Goldmann applanation tonometer(GAT)and non-contact tonometer(NCT)and find the laws of the two methods.

    METHODS: The IOP of 108 glaucoma patients(206 eyes)were measured by GAT and NCT respectively.

    RESULTS: In 108 glaucoma patients, the average IOP of 206 eyes was 29.77±10.27mmHg by GAT and 24.59±8.58mmHg by NCT. There was significant difference between GAT and NCT(P<0.01). The higher of IOP, the difference between GAT and NCT was greater.

    CONCLUSION: The measurement results with NCT were lower than that of GAT. The higher of IOP, the difference between GAT and NCT was greater. It's better to measure IOP by GAT for the glaucoma patients, in order to avoid the misdiagnosis and mistreatment of glaucoma.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李红锋,欧阳君,屈晓勇. Goldmann眼压计与非接触眼压计测量青光眼患者眼压的对比分析.国际眼科杂志, 2015,15(1):144-145.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-17
  • 最后修改日期:2014-12-19
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-12-30
  • 出版日期: