方法：选择2011-01/06于我院行双眼白内障超声乳化摘除术，双眼间隔1d，并且联合行折叠式人工晶状体植入术的受试者78例作为研究对象，手术均由同一熟练的超声乳化手术医师完成。患者术后定期随访，于术后3mo由同一医师分别使用计算机随机点立体图和TNO立体视检查图检查立体视觉并比较其结果差异。

结果：所有受试者均具有不同程度的立体视，由计算机随机点立体图测得黄斑部位立体视患者14例，黄斑中心凹部位立体视患者26例，眼底周边部位立体视38例； TNO立体视觉检查图分别为11例，24例和43例，黄斑立体视、黄斑中心凹立体视随机点检出率较TNO图高，但是两者差异无统计学意义。使用计算机随机点立体图测得的正常与异常立体视结果为32例、46例，使用TNO立体视检查图测得的正常与异常立体视结果为35例、43例，差异无统计学意义。

结论：新型计算机随机点立体视图对白内障术后立体视检查的结果与TNO立体图具有较高的一致性，是一种可靠的测量立体视功能的方法，可以用于白内障患者术后立体视觉功能的检测。

METHODS: Seventy-eight patients who received bilateral phacoemulsification from Januray, 2011 to June, 2011 were involved. The operations were performed by the same surgeon. Three months after the operation, CRDS and TNO test were used to evaluate the patients' stereopsis respectively. The inspection results of the two methods were compared.

RESULTS:All patients presented stereoscopic vision. There were 26 patients with foveal stereoacuity, 14 with macular stereoscopic vision and 38 with peripheral stereovision measured with CRDS, while it was 24, 11, 43 measured with TNO test. There were 32 patients with normal stereopsis, 46 patients with abnormal stereopsis and 35 patients with normal stereopsis, 43 patients with abnormal stereopsis respectively measured with CRDS and TNO test. No significant differences were found between the two methods.

CONCLUSION: The inspection result of CRDS has a high coherence with that of TNO test. It suggests that the CRDS is a reliable method for stereoaeuity evaluation in post-operative patients.