27G与25G微创玻璃体切除术术后短期指标对比分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金青年项目(No.81700841); 电子科技大学中央高校基金项目(No.ZYGX2015J126:A03013023801125/A03013023801224)


Comparative study of the short-term results of 27-gauge versus 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy for vitreoretinal diseases
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 81700841); Central University Fund of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(No.ZYGX2015J126: A03013023801125/A03013023801224)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较27G与25G微创玻璃体切除术治疗玻璃体视网膜疾病术后短期指标,探讨27G微创玻璃体切除术的可行性、安全性及实用性。

    方法:回顾性分析2016-04/2017-10在我院行27G与25G微创玻璃体切除术治疗玻璃体视网膜疾病患者217例217眼的临床资料,其中27G组135例,25G组82例。分析两组患者手术时间、术中并发症、术后眼部炎症反应、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)恢复及眼压波动等情况。

    结果:两组患者均顺利完成手术,27G组无患者术中需改为25G玻璃体切除术。25G组手术时间平均56.4±38.9min,27G组45.5±26.1min,差异有统计学意义(t=2.422,P=0.016),但两组中相同疾病的患者手术时间分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1wk内,25G组结膜充血、前房闪辉及房水细胞累积评分平均为2.4±1.4、0.7±1、0.5±1分,均高于27G组的相应指标的平均累积评分2.1±1.6、0.3±0.6、0.2±0.4分,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.038、0.011、0.046)。术后第7d,25G组BCVA(LogMAR)较术前改善-0.4±0.9,27G组BCVA(LogMAR)较术前改善-0.2±0.9,差异无统计学意义(t=-1.636,P=0.103)。术后1wk内,25G组发生一过性低眼压16眼(19.5%),27G组21眼(15.6%),差异无统计学意义(χ2= 0.565,P=0.452); 去除硅油填充的病例后,25G组眼压波动(3.59±0.69mmHg)与27G组(3.58±0.47mmHg)比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.007,P=0.995)。

    结论:27G微创玻璃体切除术可用于多种视网膜玻璃体疾病的治疗,具有创伤小、手术反应轻等特点,是治疗玻璃体视网膜疾病的一种安全、实用的手术方式。

    Abstract:

    AIM:To compare the short-term surgical results of 27-gauge(27G)with 25-gauge(25G)microincision vitrectomy surgery(MIVS)for the treatment of vitreoretinal diseases and evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of 27G MIVS.

    METHODS:Two hundred and seventeen eyes with various vitreoretinal diseases underwent 27G or 25G MIVS from April 2016 to October 2017 and were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred and thirty-five eyes underwent 27G vitrectomy and 82 eyes for 25G vitrectomy. The main outcome measurements of the study included surgical time, intraoperative complications, postoperative ocular inflammation reaction, short-term best corrected visual acuity(BCVA, LogMAR)recovery and intraocular pressure fluctuation.

    RESULTS:All surgeries were completed successfully, and no eye in 27G group needed conversion to 25G vitrectomy. The mean surgical times in the 25G group was 56.4±38.9 min, which was significant longer than that of 27G group(45.5±26.1 min, t=2.422, P=0.016). However, when comparing the surgical time for each category of disease, there were no significant differences observed(P>0.05). Within the first week postoperatively, the mean cumulative score of conjunctival congestion, anterior chamber flare and aqueous cell in 25G group were 2.4±1.4, 0.7±1 and 0.5±1, which were higher than those in 27G group(2.1±1.6, 0.3±0.6, and 0.2±0.4), with significant differences(P=0.038, P=0.011, P=0.046 respectively). The improvement of BCVA was -0.4±0.9 in 25G group, and -0.2±0.9 in the 27G groups respectively(t=-1.636, P=0.103). The rate of transient ocular hypotony of the 25G vitrectomy was 19.5%(16 eyes), which was higher than that of the 27G group without significant difference(15.6%, 21 eyes; χ2=0.565, P=0.452). When the eyes injected with silicone oil were excluded, there was no significant difference in intraocular pressure fluctuation between the 25G group(3.59±0.69mmHg)and the 27G group(3.58±0.47mmHg; t=0.007, P=0.995).

    CONCLUSION: The 27G microincision vitrectomy can be used to treat various vitreoretinal diseases. It is a safe and effective surgical procedure with small incision and mild anterior segment inflammatory reaction.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李杰,刘三梅,李芳,等.27G与25G微创玻璃体切除术术后短期指标对比分析.国际眼科杂志, 2018,18(7):1252-1256.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-04
  • 最后修改日期:2018-06-11
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-06-27
  • 出版日期: