折叠顶压球囊与传统巩膜外加压治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的对比研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

河南省医学科技攻关计划(No.LHGJ20190867)


Comparative study on the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment between foldable capsular body and scleral buckling
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Medical Science and Technology Research Program of Henan(No.LHGJ20190867)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:对折叠顶压球囊(FCB)与传统巩膜外加压术(SB)治疗孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)的疗效及并发症进行对比研究。

    方法:回顾性分析2019-03/2022-04我院81例82眼RRD患者的临床资料,对比两种治疗方式下患者术后的视网膜复位率、最佳矫正视力和视网膜下积液吸收的疗效差异,以及术后不适、并发症的发生率。

    结果:术后FCB组视网膜复位率为96%,SB组复位率为92%,两组无差异(P>0.05)。两组波及黄斑患眼的最佳矫正视力手术前后比较均有差异(P<0.01)。两组均可促进患眼视网膜下积液吸收。FCB组手术时间为16.50(12.75,25.00)min,SB组手术时间为38.00(36.25,41.75)min(P<0.001)。FCB组患者术后眼睑肿胀不适发生率明显低于SB组(P<0.001),术后1d FCB组VAS疼痛评分1.00(0.00,2.00)分,SB组3.00(2.00,3.00)分(P<0.001)。

    结论:FCB治疗RRD是一种安全有效且可减轻患者痛苦的手术方法,相较于SB,手术时间明显缩短,患者术后不良反应轻。

    Abstract:

    AIM: To compare the effectiveness and complications of treating rhegmatogenous retinal detachment(RRD)with foldable capsule body(FCB)and scleral buckling(SB).

    METHODS: The clinical data of 81 patients(82 eyes)with RRD who underwent surgery at our hospital from March 2019 to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The differences in retinal reattachment rate, best-corrected visual acuity, the absorption of subretinal fluid, postoperative discomfort and incidence of complications between the two treatments were compared.

    RESULTS: The retinal reattachment rate was 96% in the FCB group and 92% in the SB group, with no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). The best corrected visual acuity of the affected macular eyes was different in the both groups(P<0.01). Both groups effectively promoted the absorption of subretinal fluid. The operation time of FCB group was 16.50(12.75, 25.00)min, while it was 38.00(36.25, 41.75)min in the SB group(P<0.001). Patients in the FCB group also had significantly lower eyelid swelling and pain symptoms than those in the SB group(P<0.001). The visual analogue scale(VAS)score at 1d after operation was 1.00(0.00, 2.00)in the FCB group and 3.00(2.00, 3.00)in the SB group(P<0.001).

    CONCLUSION: FCB is a safe and effective surgical method to treat RRD that can alleviate patient's pain. Furthermore, FCB has a significantly shorter operation time and milder postoperative adverse reactions than SB.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张宁,张百珂,贾雍,等.折叠顶压球囊与传统巩膜外加压治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的对比研究.国际眼科杂志, 2023,23(5):813-817.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-10
  • 最后修改日期:2023-04-03
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-04-27
  • 出版日期: