超声睫状体成形术联合抗VEGF+视网膜光凝术治疗晚期新生血管性青光眼的疗效观察
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

济南明水眼科医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Therapeutic effect of ultrasonic cycloplasty combined with anti-VEGF + retinal photocoagulation in the treatment of advanced neovascular glaucoma
Author:
Affiliation:

Jinanshi Mingshui Eye Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:评估UCP联合抗VEGF+视网膜光凝手术治疗晚期新生血管行青光眼的安全性及有效性,并与传统睫状体光凝术与单纯UCP手术进行比较。 方法:收集2020年8月-2022年9月就诊于我院手术并定期完成至少3个月随访的新生血管性青光眼患者,根据其治疗方案选择分为实验组(UCP+抗VEGF组)、对照组1(睫状体光凝+抗VEGF组)、对照组2(单纯UCP组),实验组中共纳入16例(16眼),年龄35-74岁(平均年龄57.75±11.43),对照组1纳入20例(20眼),年龄30-76岁(平均年龄58.38±11.31岁),对照组2纳入9例(9眼),年龄22-90岁(平均年龄58±19岁)。术前及术后1d、1周、1个月评估其疼痛评分,记录并比较眼压、术后用药及并发症发生情况。术后3个月统计其有效率、总成功率及总并发症发生率。 结果:实验组与对照组1相比,两组术前眼压差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组组内不同时间点对比,差异较术前有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组各时间点两两对比,虽然对照组1术后1m、3m、6m眼压较实验组偏高,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组总效应对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后疼痛在术后1d、1w对比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),在其他时间点差异无统计学意义。术后用药各时间点差异无统计学意义。手术并发症差异无统计学意义。实验组与对照组2相比:两组术前眼压差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组组内不同时间点对比,差异较术前有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组各时间点两两对比,对照组2术后眼压较实验组整体偏高,术后1d、1w差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后1m、3m差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组总效应对比,差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组术后疼痛、术后用药、术后并发症各时间点对比,差异无统计学意义。成功率:实验组、对照组1与对照组2在术后3个月成功率分别为68.8%、50%、0%,有效率81.3%、75%、66.7%。 结论:UCP联合抗VEGF+视网膜光凝与传统睫状体光凝手术在晚期新生血管性青光眼患者的治疗中,其降眼压效果相当。UCP联合抗VEGF+视网膜光凝术后患者疼痛更轻,且无严重并发症。单纯UCP手术可在术后早期有效控制眼压,减轻患者疼痛,但长期控制仍需联合抗VEGF+视网膜光凝术。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasonic cycloplasty (UCP) combined with anti-VEGF + retinal photocoagulation for advanced neovascular glaucoma(NVG) and compare it with conventional ciliary body photocoagulation and UCP alone. Methods: Patients with advanced neovascular glaucoma who received surgery in our hospital from August 2020 to September 2022 and completed regular follow-up for at least 3 months were collected and divided into experimental group (UCP+ anti-VEGF group), control group 1 (ciliary body photocoagulation + anti-VEGF group) and control group 2 (UCP group alone) according to their treatment options.?A total of 16 patients (16 eyes) aged 35-74 years old (mean age 57.75±11.43) were included in the experimental group, 20 patients (20 eyes) aged 58.38±11.31 years old (mean age 30-76) were included in the control group 1, and 9 patients (9 eyes) aged 22-90 years old (mean age 58±19) were included in the control group 2.?Pain scores were evaluated before surgery and 1 day, 1 week and 1 month after surgery. Date on intraocular pressure (IOP), postoperative medication and complications were collected and compared.?The effective rate, total success rate and total complication rate were measured 3 months after operation. Results: There was no significant difference in preoperative intraocular pressure between the experimental group and the control group 1 (P > 0.05), but there was significant difference at different time points between the two groups (P < 0.01). Although the intraocular pressure at 1m, 3m and 6m in control group 1 was higher than that in the experimental group, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the total effect between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was significant difference in postoperative pain between the two groups at 1 day and 1 week after operation (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference at other time points. There was no significant difference in postoperative medication at different time points. There was no significant difference in operative complications. There was no significant difference in preoperative intraocular pressure between the experimental group and control group 2 (P > 0.05), but there was significant difference between the two groups at different time points (P < 0.01). According to the pairwise comparison of the two groups at each time point, the IOP of control group 2 was higher than that of the experimental group as a whole, and there was no significant difference at 1 day and 1 week after operation (P > 0.05), but there was significant difference at 1 m and 3 m after operation (P < 0.05). There was significant difference in total effect between the two groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in postoperative pain, postoperative medication and postoperative complications between the two groups. Success rate: three months after operation, the success rates of experimental group, control group 1 and control group 2 were 68.8%, 50% and 0%, respectively, and the effective rates were 81.3%, 75% and 66.7%, respectively. Conclusion: UCP combined with anti-VEGF + retinal photocoagulation, ciliary body photocoagulation showed similar efficacy in reducing IOP in advanced NVG. UCP combined with anti-VEGF + retinal photocoagulation was sufficient for relieving pain and no serious complications in advanced NVG. UCP alone can effectively control iOP in the early postoperative period, but long-term control still requires anti-VEGF + retinal photocoagulation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-01
  • 最后修改日期:2024-02-18
  • 录用日期:2024-04-17
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: